Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL <br />ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION <br />TO: Mark Casey, City Manager <br />City of St. Anthony <br /> <br />FROM: Jay Lindgren <br />Paul Beck <br />DATE: 28 July 2020 <br /> <br />RE: Review of Dangerous Dog Ordinance <br /> <br />I. Background <br />At its July 14, 2020 meeting, the City Council heard an appeal of a dangerous dog designation <br />made pursuant to City Code § 91.36. As part of the appeal, the dog owner/resident asked the <br />City Council to conduct a review of § 91.36, asking that the ordinance be repealed or amended <br />because it is inconsistent with state statute and the practice of other metro area communities. <br />The Council upheld the dangerous dog designation under the current § 91.36, but stayed <br />enforcement of the mandatory prohibition on dangerous dogs pending its review of the <br />ordinance. <br />This Memorandum summarizes the current St. Anthony ordinance, the detailed state statutory <br />scheme surrounding the designation and regulation of dangerous dogs, and a sample of <br />ordinances from other metro area communities. Ultimately, we recommend that the City <br />ordinances be amended to adopt the state statutory scheme by reference and repeal the <br />prohibition on dangerous dogs in § 91.36. Additionally, we recommend that the Council <br />consider adopting additional clarifying language to fill in the gaps in the state statute, including: <br />regulation of potentially dangerous dogs, clarifying the roles of city staff in designations and <br />appeals, and specifying the annual registration fee for dangerous dogs. <br />A redline of the current ordinance reflecting our recommended changes is enclosed with this <br />Memorandum. <br />II. Current St. Anthony Ordinance <br />St. Anthony city ordinance § 91.36 provides “[n]o person may keep on their premises, or on <br />premises occupied by them, nor permit to run at large in the city, any dog or other <br />domesticated animal of a ferocious or vicious character, habit, or disposition as defined by <br />M.S. § 347.50(2).” The referenced state statute is the definition of “dangerous dog,” as <br />discussed in Section III.A of this Memorandum. Section 91.36 further provides that “[a]ny <br />animal which is diseased, vicious, dangerous, rabid, or exposed to rabies may be impounded,” <br />and that if the animal cannot be impounded without serious risk to the person seeking to <br />impound it, it may be killed immediately by a police officer or other designated person. <br />The City Code provides an aggrieved owner with the opportunity to appeal a dangerous dog <br />designation to the City Council within 14 days of the designation. St. Anthony Mun. Code § <br />91.44. Additionally, the ordinance provides for an appeal of a designation of a potentially <br />dangerous dog by appointment with the Chief of Police or his/her designee.