My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 09082020
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020
>
CC PACKET 09082020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/3/2020 8:33:06 AM
Creation date
9/3/2020 8:21:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 8, 2020 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br /> <br />Lighting. To date, a lighting plan has not been submitted for review. As a condition of Final <br />PUD approval, a lighting plan should be submitted for review which demonstrates <br />compliance with City requirements. <br /> <br />Signage. The Preliminary PUD application does not include any information related to <br />signage. As a condition of Final PUD approval, a sign plan must be submitted which <br />demonstrates compliance with applicable City sign requirements. <br /> <br />Trash Handling. A trash handling enclosure is proposed in the extreme southeast corner of <br />the site. As a condition of Final PUD approval, the applicant should provide details related <br />trash enclosure design. The enclosure should utilize materials typical of the principal <br />building. <br /> <br />Grading, Drainage, and Utilities. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities should be <br />subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />PUD Agreement. As a condition of Final PUD approval, the applicant will be required to <br />enter into a PUD agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by <br />it. <br /> <br />SUMMARY AND STAFF/PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Preliminary Plan PUD - Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. Access-related issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City <br />Engineer. <br /> <br />2. In recognition of other development sites within the Silver Lake PUD which were <br />developed at densities less than 40 units per acre, the City finds the proposed <br />residential density (44.7 units per acre) to be acceptable. <br /> <br />3. The City finds that the proposed 20-foot building setback along 38th Avenue NE will <br />not negatively impact adjacent properties and is therefore considered acceptable <br />(within the context of the PUD). <br /> <br />4. The City finds that the proposed parking supply (and the deficit based on Ordinance <br />requirements) is adequate to serve the parking demand generated by the proposed <br />apartment building. <br /> <br />45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.