Laserfiche WebLink
September 8, 2020 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br /> <br />Lighting. To date, a lighting plan has not been submitted for review. As a condition of Final <br />PUD approval, a lighting plan should be submitted for review which demonstrates <br />compliance with City requirements. <br /> <br />Signage. The Preliminary PUD application does not include any information related to <br />signage. As a condition of Final PUD approval, a sign plan must be submitted which <br />demonstrates compliance with applicable City sign requirements. <br /> <br />Trash Handling. A trash handling enclosure is proposed in the extreme southeast corner of <br />the site. As a condition of Final PUD approval, the applicant should provide details related <br />trash enclosure design. The enclosure should utilize materials typical of the principal <br />building. <br /> <br />Grading, Drainage, and Utilities. Issues related to grading, drainage and utilities should be <br />subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />PUD Agreement. As a condition of Final PUD approval, the applicant will be required to <br />enter into a PUD agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by <br />it. <br /> <br />SUMMARY AND STAFF/PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Preliminary Plan PUD - Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. Access-related issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City <br />Engineer. <br /> <br />2. In recognition of other development sites within the Silver Lake PUD which were <br />developed at densities less than 40 units per acre, the City finds the proposed <br />residential density (44.7 units per acre) to be acceptable. <br /> <br />3. The City finds that the proposed 20-foot building setback along 38th Avenue NE will <br />not negatively impact adjacent properties and is therefore considered acceptable <br />(within the context of the PUD). <br /> <br />4. The City finds that the proposed parking supply (and the deficit based on Ordinance <br />requirements) is adequate to serve the parking demand generated by the proposed <br />apartment building. <br /> <br />45