Laserfiche WebLink
September 8, 2020 <br />Page 12 <br />5.The City finds that the limited size of the subject and target tenant base justify an off- <br />street parking supply which does not include covered spaces (within the context of the <br />PUD). <br />6.In consideration if the limited site size and previous site development conditions, the <br />City finds the proposed impervious surface coverage of 76.7 to be acceptable. <br />7.Impacts associated with the proposed impervious surface coverage shall be subject to <br />comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. <br />8.As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a lighting plan be submitted for review which <br />demonstrates compliance with City requirements. <br />9.As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a signage plan be submitted for review <br />which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. <br />10.As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, details shall be provided related to the <br />proposed trash enclosure design. <br />11.Issues related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and utilities shall be <br />subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. <br />12.The applicant enter into a PUD agreement with the City and post all the necessary <br />securities required by it. <br />13.Consideration of comments of other City Staff. <br />This recommendation is based on a finding that the proposal, with the conditions cited, is <br />consistent with the requirements for PUD consideration, with the long-term objectives of <br />the Silver Lake Village PUD, and with the recommendations and policies of the St. Anthony <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />As noted previously, the Planning Commission did not arrive at a recommendation as a part <br />of its review. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />Exhibit A: Location map <br />Exhibit B: Application and Supporting Material <br />46