CC PACKET 03232021 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Councilmember Jenson asked what the analysis looks like as far as the vacuums if they were 1 fully mitigated. Mr. Messner stated that is difficult to determine without a proposed design. This 2 will be evaluated in the final plans. They would not be allowed to exceed the L50 standard. 3 4 Councilmember Walker asked with only the hoses exposed, he asked about the noise that would 5 come from the customers who had music playing loud or their vehicle noise. 6 7 Mayor Stille stated he has the same question. It’s more of a management question rather than 8 engineering. Mayor Stille asked Mr. Messner for a summary of the air quality study. This 9 project would not require a State review. A greenhouse analysis was done and the result was the 10 emissions were not a significant issue and far below any state standard. 11 12 Councilmember Jenson asked about the water control. Mr. Messner stated the City has a Water 13 Resource Management Plan for any new development within the City. The study included the 14 amount of water that runs off the site. The applicant is proposing to construct a rain garden on 15 site which would improve the down stream quality of the water running off the site and also a 16 retention pond. Volume and flood control were also. The City requires volume control. The 17 storm water would be treated before entering the storm water system. The site plan appears to 18 meet the requirements; however, the rain garden size needs to be addressed. Mississippi 19 Watershed standards do not apply due to the size of the site. 20 21 Mr. Tom Archambault, applicant, asked if the Council had any specific questions regarding the 22 plans. 23 24 Councilmember Walker asked about how the noise from the customers that may occur. Mr. 25 Archambault stated he visited seven other locations that operate the same equipment and found 26 each site was staffed by at least three staff to make sure vehicles were not kept running and that 27 radios are turned down. Staff would be trained properly to address concerns. The noise from the 28 vacuum cleaners, the way the cleaners work each station does not have its own motor. It’s a large 29 turbine system that creates the vacuum. The turbine will be housed in the equipment room. The 30 only thing that would be heard would be the suction of the vacuum. He does not believe 31 Condition #7 is an issue. 32 33 Councilmember Jenson stated there are a number of residents that have a concern about this 34 project and requested Mr. Archambault comment on each of the 12 conditions. Mr. Archambault 35 stated regarding property value degradation, the study showed there would be no degradation to 36 the neighboring homes. Mr. Grittman stated the City did ask a certified appraiser as to an opinion 37 about property values decreasing and the opinion was since it is Commercial those values are 38 built into the neighboring property values as they stand. There would be no negative 39 consequences to property values. The appraiser’s report was included in the Council packet for 40 review. 41 42 Mayor Stille stated the applicant must abide by the conditions if Council approves. Mr. 43 Archambault stated a number of the conditions are black and white and if not done, the permit 44 would not be received. He already spoke regarding Condition #7 and could possibly be 45 eliminated. Condition #8 needs some rewording knowing how the wash is done and the industry 46 6