Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />March 9, 2021 <br />Page 6 <br />1 Councilmember Jenson asked what the analysis looks like as far as the vacuums if they were <br />2 fully mitigated. Mr. Messner stated that is difficult to determine without a proposed design. This <br />3 will be evaluated in the final plans. They would not be allowed to exceed the L50 standard. <br />4 <br />5 Councilmember Walker asked with only the hoses exposed, he asked about the noise that would <br />6 come from the customers who had music playing loud or their vehicle noise. <br />7 <br />8 Mayor Stille stated he has the same question. It's more of a management question rather than <br />9 engineering. Mayor Stille asked Mr. Messner for a summary of the air quality study. This <br />10 project would not require a State review. A greenhouse analysis was done and the result was the <br />11 emissions were not a significant issue and far below any state standard. <br />12 <br />13 Councilmember Jenson asked about the water control. Mr. Messner stated the City has a Water <br />14 Resource Management Plan for any new development within the City. The study included the <br />15 amount of water that runs off the site. The applicant is proposing to construct a rain garden on <br />16 site which would improve the down stream quality of the water running off the site and also a <br />17 retention pond. Volume and flood control were also. The City requires volume control. The <br />18 storm water would be treated before entering the storm water system. The site plan appears to <br />19 meet the requirements; however, the rain garden size needs to be addressed. Mississippi <br />20 Watershed standards do not apply due to the size of the site. <br />21 <br />22 Mr. Tom Archambault, applicant, asked if the Council had any specific questions regarding the <br />23 plans. <br />24 <br />25 Councilmember Walker asked about how the noise from the customers that may occur. Mr. <br />26 Archambault stated he visited seven other locations that operate the same equipment and found <br />27 each site was staffed by at least three staff to make sure vehicles were not kept running and that <br />28 radios are turned down. Staff would be trained properly to address concerns. The noise from the <br />29 vacuum cleaners, the way the cleaners work each station does not have its own motor. It's a large <br />30 turbine system that creates the vacuum. The turbine will be housed in the equipment room. The <br />31 only thing that would be heard would be the suction of the vacuum. He does not believe <br />32 Condition #7 is an issue. <br />33 <br />34 Councilmember Jenson stated there are a number of residents that have a concern about this <br />35 project and requested Mr. Archambault comment on each of the 12 conditions. Mr. Archambault <br />36 stated regarding property value degradation, the study showed there would be no degradation to <br />37 the neighboring homes. Mr. Grittman stated the City did ask a certified appraiser as to an opinion <br />38 about property values decreasing and the opinion was since it is Commercial those values are <br />39 built into the neighboring property values as they stand. There would be no negative <br />40 consequences to property values. The appraiser's report was included in the Council packet for <br />41 review. <br />42 <br />43 Mayor Stille stated the applicant must abide by the conditions if Council approves. Mr. <br />44 Archambault stated a number of the conditions are black and white and if not done, the permit <br />45 would not be received. He already spoke regarding Condition #7 and could possibly be <br />46 eliminated. Condition #8 needs some rewording knowing how the wash is done and the industry <br />