Laserfiche WebLink
City Planner Steve Grittman reviewed at their April meeting the Planning Commission discussed 1 <br />staff-proposed amendments to the R-4 Zoning District during a work session. At that session, the 2 <br />Commission agreed that the proposed amendment, with some additions and modifications, was 3 <br />ready to proceed to consideration at a public hearing for formal Planning Commission 4 <br />recommendation. 5 <br /> 6 <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the updated language at its July 20, 2021 7 <br />Regular Meeting. No resident or public comments were received. The intent of the update is to 8 <br />create a zoning district for multiple family development that is consistent with the 9 <br />Comprehensive Plan in terms of density, allows for more contemporary building size and scope, 10 <br />and identifies a series of baseline performance standards and expectations for any new such 11 <br />development. 12 <br /> 13 <br />A copy of the current regulations in place, as well as an updated table-form document that lists 14 <br />the series of potential amendments to the district was provided to the City Council for review. 15 <br />Comments are provided for each proposed change discussing the rationale behind the new 16 <br />language. Also provided is ordinance-form language, and a red-lined version identifying all the 17 <br />changes from the current code. 18 <br /> 19 <br />The current district language was established many years ago, and reflects a more moderate 20 <br />density, suburban style of multi-family development. In the past few years, the City has 21 <br />considered multi-family projects on four different sites. One of these projects did not proceed. 22 <br />Each of those were required to utilize the PUD zoning process due to a series of modifications 23 <br />the projects required from typical R-4 regulations, including density, setbacks, parking 24 <br />calculations, height, and other factors. 25 <br /> 26 <br />The current R-4 District restricts density to anywhere from about 13 units per acre up to 24 units 27 <br />per acre, depending upon the size of the building. Over the past two years, the City considered 28 <br />and adopted, an updated Comprehensive Plan that directs development in high density zoning 29 <br />districts to between 20 and 40 units per acre. 30 <br /> 31 <br />The items included in the last stage of updating are: 32 <br />• Modify the prior staff-proposed allowable maximum height from sixty feet and five 33 <br />stories to fifty feet and four stories. 34 <br />• Address the proposed requirement for location of senior multi-family on a collector or 35 <br />arterial street (due to concerns over existing facilities that may not comply with this 36 <br />standard). The proposed language includes an alternative that the facility is served by 37 <br />alternative transit options, either public or privately offered. 38 <br />• Adding requirements to the “General Regulations” in Section 152.105 relating to: 39 <br />o Building materials; 40 <br />o Landscaping; and 41 <br />o Sustainability. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Planning Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed amendments. 44 <br />These changes will make multi-family development more straightforward in those areas where it 45 <br />2