Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />September 14, 2021 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />1. The applicant participates in a subdivision of the portion of 26544 Kenzie that encroaches 1 <br />into the alley and the City retains ownership of that remnant. 2 <br />2. Access-related issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the City 3 <br />Engineer, as well as Hennepin County and Minneapolis Park Board. 4 <br />3. The proposed bank site plan is modified to increase drive-through lane stacking space. 5 <br />4. The applicants modify the landscaping plan for the bank location to retain a portion of the 6 <br />existing evergreen plantings. 7 <br />5. The proposed monument sign on the bank site is placed and designed to meet city 8 <br />ordinances for size and setback. If an electronic display is desired, the applicants will 9 <br />need to apply for a separate Conditional Use Permit under the applicable code. 10 <br />6. The lighting plan for the proposed bank site is modified to show a zero footcandle light 11 <br />intensity at the boundary with the senior residential property to the west. 12 <br />7. The applicant adds foundation plantings along the Stinson and Kenzie frontages of the 13 <br />residential building. 14 <br />8. The City finds that the proposed parking supply is adequate to serve the residential 15 <br />facility. 16 <br />9. Final PUD Plans demonstrate compliance with ADA parking supply requirements (for 17 <br />disabled persons). 18 <br />10. As part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a final signage plan be submitted for review 19 <br />which demonstrates compliance with City requirements. 20 <br />11. Issues related to grading, drainage, and utilities shall be subject to comment and 21 <br />recommendation by the City Engineer. 22 <br />12. The applicant enter into a PUD agreement with the City and post all the necessary 23 <br />securities required by it. 24 <br />13. The applicant executes the required land transfers suitable to the City Council. 25 <br />14. Consideration of comments of other City Staff. 26 <br /> 27 <br />This recommendation is based on a finding that the proposal, with the conditions cited, is 28 <br />consistent with the requirements for PUD consideration, with the long-term objectives of the 29 <br />recommendations and policies of the St. Anthony Comprehensive Plan. 30 <br /> 31 <br />City Planner Grittman (via Zoom) thanked Commissioner Morita for his presentation. Mr. 32 <br />Grittman noted the applicant has made a number of updates to their site plans in response to 33 <br />Planning Commission concerns. A number of Sustainability issues have been included in their 34 <br />proposal. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mayor Stille asked about the parking. Mr. Grittman stated the amount of parking proposed meets 37 <br />the R-4 standards but the issue arises that the applicants propose to charge separately for the 38 <br />underground parking. If more than a few opt not to purchase underground parking, there would 39 <br />be use of surface parking and may overflow onto the City streets. The issue raised, is in staff’s 40 <br />opinion the applicants need to provide the underground parking in their rent structure to the 41 <br />tenants. Mayor Stille asked how this issue could be addressed. Mr. Grittman stated there will be 42 <br />a PUD that imposes whatever approvals Council places on this. Staff recommends that condition 43 <br />be included as part of the PUD Agreement. 44 <br /> 45 <br />10