Laserfiche WebLink
February 15, 2022 <br />Page 3 <br />For Comprehensive Plan amendments, the process is more complex. The Planning <br />Commission holds the public hearing, and the City Council then is asked to approve the <br />amendment for the purposes of notifying adjoining or affected jurisdictions (neighboring <br />cities, watershed districts, school districts, affected state agencies, etc.). The jurisdictions <br />have up to 6 months to comment on the proposed amendment. <br />Once those comments are received, the City decides how to respond to the comments, and <br />then sends the proposed amendment (with the comments and responses) to the <br />Metropolitan Council for review and comment. The Met Council is responsible for <br />reviewing the document for its consistency with regional plans adopted by the Council. <br />The Met Council will review the proposed impacts on several factors, including population <br />projections, road and traffic considerations, impacts on regional parks, housing (and <br />affordable housing impact), and sanitary sewer impacts – among others. <br />This process parallels the original adoption of the 2040 plan, which was prepared under the <br />requirements of the Met Council as well. For the 2040 plan to be approved, the City was <br />required to show how its future land use plan provided adequate land areas for the <br />population and housing projections made by Met Council, along with the City’s required <br />allocation of affordable housing units, also assigned by Met Council. <br />At the time the Comprehensive Plan was being prepared, there were no specific <br />redevelopment plans for the subject property. The property owner had removed most of <br />the buildings in the manufactured home park, but for a few retained homes and a few <br />common/maintenance buildings. The City adopted its new land use plan with newly revised <br />density allowances (between20 and 40 units per acre) while at the time, the property <br />owner was preparing the site for redevelopment. Planning staff is unaware of any specific <br />redevelopment plans provided to the city in the form of development or zoning applications <br />or site plan requests during this period, and no formal applications were made. <br />After a series of back-and-forth negotiations with Met Council staff, the Met Council <br />formally approved the Comprehensive Plan in April of 2020 – although the formal <br />submissions were occurring during previous 12 months. <br />Also during this period, the property owner began redevelopment of the property as a <br />manufactured home park. The City considered the manufactured home park a continuing <br />“grandfathered” use since there had been some buildings retained during the period that <br />the park appeared to be mostly closed. The only formal land use application made during <br />this period was for the subdivision removing the westerly 4+ acres from the bulk of the <br />property, which is currently under development of a senior housing project. <br />Current Amendment Application. <br />As noted, the applicant is seeking a revision to the Land Use Plan, redesignating the land <br />from High- to Low-Density Residential. To pursue this amendment, the City will need to <br />revise more than the map, since the map is directly tied to many of the numbers used <br />elsewhere in the plan for sewer, traffic, and most notably, housing. <br />Because the Comprehensive Plan was approved with a fixed requirement for new housing <br />units, and a component of affordable units, the land use guidance for this site afforded the <br />opportunity to assign several of those unit allocations. The Met Council staff’s approval