My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 07252023
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2023
>
CC PACKET 07252023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2023 3:29:04 PM
Creation date
7/21/2023 3:27:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />July 11, 2023 <br />Page 2 <br />A.1 Resolution 23-035 – Approving a Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Modification <br />2 to a Car Wash Facility in the PUD District. <br />3 <br />4 City Planner Steve Grittman stated the applicants at 3801 Stinson Boulevard are seeking a <br />5 Conditional Use Permit to modify and add vacuum facilities to an existing car wash. The North <br />6 Star Car Wash is an automatic car wash building, with a few individual vacuum stations in a <br />7 portion of the parking area near the exit from the wash building. Traffic enters the site – <br />8 primarily from 38th Street NE, enters the car wash building at its east side, proceeds through the <br />9 wash to the exit on the west side and then may park to the south at individual vacuum locations <br />10 near the exit. Traffic can exit the site back to 38th Street NE, or there is a shared access point to <br />11 the 3803 parcel to the north. <br />12 <br />13 The applicant’s plans show the replacement of these individual vacuum sites with a common <br />14 vacuum system all along the parking area on the south side of the building. What is currently an <br />15 open parking area (adequate for approximately 10 parked vehicles) would be converted to 8 <br />16 vacuum stations. These stations would be fed from an equipment area at the east end of the row <br />17 of “parking” spaces. The plan drawing shows the equipment in an island area, but no curb or <br />18 island currently exists in that space. It appears that the project would plan to add that island area. <br />19 <br />20 The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal during a public hearing at its regular meeting <br />21 on June 20, 2023. The applicant was present, along with a representative of the applicant with <br />22 specific experience relating to the vacuum system proposed. In addition, several members of the <br />23 public were present. All members of the public who spoke and two written correspondence prior <br />24 to the hearing, were supportive of the proposal. <br />25 <br />26 The Planning Commission discussed the proposal, the staff report and recommendations, and the <br />27 comments provided at the hearing. The Commission then voted unanimously to recommend <br />28 approval of the Conditional Use Permit, with three specific modifications to the conditions of <br />29 approval offered by staff. The applicant expressed support for these changes. The staff <br />30 conditions, and the recommended changes in redline were provided for Council consideration. <br />31 <br />32 Staff has reviewed the project for land use compliance with the intent and policies of the City’s <br />33 Comprehensive Plan, and for zoning consistency with the Commercial District as a baseline. In <br />34 summary, the Comprehensive Plan supports mixed uses in this area, and Commercial uses are <br />35 part of that mix. The proposed application would, with appropriate conditions, facilitate that <br />36 purpose for the subject property. The conditions recommended by Staff, and clarified by the <br />37 Planning Commission, mitigate potential noise and light impacts from the new vacuum facilities. <br />38 The conditions recommended are: <br />39 <br />1.40 The applicant adds a structured enclosure of maintenance free fencing consisting of <br />41 complementary materials surrounding (at least on three sides) the proposed common <br />42 equipment shown on the plan, at least as tall as the equipment, to screen views and potential <br />43 noise issues from adjoining residential property. This fencing shall be supplemented by a <br />44 planting of shrubs surrounding the enclosure. <br />2.45 The applicant verifies that the additional noise generated by the equipment will be dissipated <br />46 to no more than existing levels at the property line with the proposed enclosure.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.