Laserfiche WebLink
September 24th, 2024 <br />Page 9 <br />The original submittals proposed an operation that includes daily delivery of students to and <br />from the site by automobile. Up to 100 students are expected to participate in the programs <br />offered on the property, with between 10 and 20 staff members. The applicants expect to <br />provide programming and/or staff presence generally between 9:00am and 7:00pm. <br />Because the use is not a childcare or school facility, the applicants indicate that they are not <br />required to have any outside licensing. The applicants originally stated that they anticipate no <br />outdoor programming as a part of the site usage, however, the revised plans provide an <br />outdoor play/recreation space. In addition, the applicants have indicated that other accessory <br />activities may occur outdoors. <br />Site and Building Improvements. <br />Parking and Building Capacity. With regard to capacity of the religious worship space, the <br />zoning ordinance does not establish any limitation. However, such facilities are required to <br />provide off-street parking at a rate of one space per 2.5 person capacity (not including spaces <br />reserved for staff and employees on a one-space-per-employee basis). The illustrated site plan <br />provides a total of 76 parking spaces. The applicants should provide additional information <br />relating to the number of staff during peak times that services are being held, and will be <br />required to scale the religious services capacity to meet the remaining parking supply. By way <br />of example only, if there are 10 employees, the remaining available parking will be a total of 66 <br />spaces, yielding a capacity for services of 165 assembled attendants (66 times 2.5). <br />The applicants have not provided detail on interior space remodeling. Initially, this was not a <br />concern given the nature of the use as originally described. However, with the religious <br />services creating the possibility that site capacity can create congestion on the adjoining public <br />streets, this information should be provided by the applicant for further review and verification <br />that the site can handle the possible traffic generated by the assembly use. <br />Access. With the greater utilization of the parking lot, access to the site is at issue. Hennepin <br />County is in the process of planning for changes to Kenzie Terrace, which currently shows two <br />access points to this site, in addition to an existing access to Stinson Parkway on the west side <br />of the site. Of the two driveways to Kenzie, the easterly of the two is aligned with the <br />intersection to Lowry Avenue, south of Kenzie. <br />The westerly of the two is just over 100 feet from the Lowry/Kenzie/Stinson intersection. This <br />driveway access should be closed as a condition of PUD approval for this site plan and use (the <br />removal of this driveway was also a condition of the prior multi-family PUD). <br />Site and Landscaping Improvements. In regard to the parking lot area, staff strongly supports <br />the “greening” of the parking area as an aspect of PUD review. For any PUD, the City should <br />find that there are aspects of the project, such as site development amenities or other design <br />factors, that help offset the City’s approval of flexibility from its base zoning standards. The <br />green space in the amended site plan is both an aesthetic improvement, as well as an <br />important environmental consideration in reducing impervious surface and the impact on <br />stormwater runoff and quality. <br />53