My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 10222024
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2024
>
CC PACKET 10222024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2024 12:03:27 PM
Creation date
10/22/2024 8:37:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />residents in a City are the decisions that the City takes that affects their tax revenue downstream, and the <br />residents end up taking the burden especially when it comes to losing tax opportunities to non‐profits. <br /> <br />I have nothing against this project as it is presented, it is just a double whammy for it to be a non‐profit as <br />well as servicing a community largely not residing in the City of St Anthony. If they had a petition showing a <br />few thousand SAV residents intending to use this facility, then we would have a different conversation. This <br />project just seems to be presented as merely a geographic convenience for the community that uses it from <br />other MSP areas. That convenience, as well as an unfortunately used race‐card, is not a good reason for SAV <br />to be giving up this opportunity for housing that it has made clear is part of their plan/mission. <br /> <br />We are not a large city like Minneapolis or St Paul, where we have excess/surplus land and zones to assign to <br />institutions like this one. What we have is scarce and must be used wisely. St Anthony needs to do something <br />creative with its opportunities, not just make amendments for short term concerns. One option is mixed‐use <br />(housing with their institution and other businesses), just something that satisfies all. We have other places in <br />SAV for community centers that can fit their needs, but not many opportunities for new and affordable <br />housing. But in any case, due to the environmental issues brought up, whatever needs to be done should be <br />extensive and safe and the City should do what's best for itself as well as those residing in St Anthony as well. <br />I echo the same ultimate comments made by the vice‐chair of the planning commission at their last <br />discussion on this: although their organization and mission is a noble one to be supported, on the basis of <br />housing and taxation, nothing they presented changes the reason for denying this change. <br /> <br />I hope the City can maintain its reputation of being a well‐functioning, non‐partisan municipality and <br />pragmatic decision maker when it comes to, not just this decision, but all future decisions when it comes to <br />how to balance itself and its constituents. I love this City, I’m proud to call it my forever home, thank you for <br />listening. <br /> <br /> <br />Yaacoub Hark <br />2914 & 3000 36th Ave NE <br />St Anthony
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.