My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WS PACKET 02252025
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2025
>
CC WS PACKET 02252025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2025 2:47:27 PM
Creation date
2/20/2025 2:47:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PAGE | 6 OF 8 <br /> <br />from applicant requirements to specific maintenance standards, to process and penalties for <br />non-compliance in the event the City is faced with a prospective landlord who works too hard <br />to avoid the City’s policies. <br /> <br />Housing Affordability <br />While housing tenure (ownership v. renter-occupied) can relate to affordability, the two factors <br />will typically conflict when a City is fully built-out such as Saint Anthony, and few new detached <br />single family homes are being built. Existing homeowners naturally wish to maximize the values <br />of their investment in real estate. The greatest influence that the City can wield on affordability <br />occurs at the time of new construction, where change is occurring and subject to City land use <br />and other related approvals. <br />Policy Issue – City Ownership. The City has explored a number of options to encourage <br />affordability in new residential projects. As owners of the 3803 Stinson Blvd property, the City <br />exercises an extraordinary amount of leverage over affordability of new housing on this site. <br />That can take the form of direct seller requirements, financial assistance (either directly <br />through price negotiations or tools like Tax Increment Financing), grant sponsorships to seek <br />outside cash, or more creative tools like land-trust ownership that lowers the per-unit cost of <br />new housing units, whether for rent or for sale. <br />Policy Issue – Zoning or Other Requirements/Mandates. Many of these tools can be utilized for <br />privately-owned project proposals. However, other zoning and housing regulations may be <br />important to incorporate into ordinance language where the City does not also have the power <br />of an owner/seller. These may include the imposition of affordability regulations for new <br />projects. Some cities have adopted baseline affordability requirements as a percentage of any <br />new housing project. <br />Policy Issue – Zoning or Other Incentive Conditions. Others have done so through the use of <br />incentives – these may relate to additional density, or conditions of City-approved financial <br />tools (such as TIF or grant-writing). The current R-4 (multi-family) zoning limits density as a <br />permitted use (to about 24 units per acre), but allowed additional density by Conditional Use <br />Permit (up to 40 units per acre). This type of threshold approach could apply to affordability as <br />well. <br />For discussion, the City should consider whether these types of tools are to be <br />integrated into future projects, and if so, whether those tools should be structured <br />as base requirements, or incentive conditions. <br />Policy Issue – Ongoing Affordability. The City has also expressed an interest in ongoing <br />affordability, seeking to ensure that once constructed and time passes, the housing that <br />benefits from the tools noted above will continue to be affordable to future occupants and <br />generations. <br /> <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.