My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05132025
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2025
>
CC PACKET 05132025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2025 10:37:03 AM
Creation date
5/13/2025 10:24:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
That said, impervious surface standards have been rigorously applied to prior applications. In this case, <br />the City Engineer’s office was asked to provide additional comment on the stormwater management of <br />the site, and whether a variance from the standard 50% coverage would be supportable. Because of the <br />site conditions, the Engineer’s office has indicated its support for the variance requested, citing the <br />positive aspects of the civil design, but with additional conditions as follows: <br />1. Demonstrate that water quality and rate control are provided in accordance with City and Rice <br />Creek Watershed District requirements. <br />2. Redesign the biofiltration basin based on final City Engineer requirements. <br />3. Add natural landscaping throughout the site to improve filtration and minimize water usage. <br />4. Add trees to maximize tree cover to help offset the loss of existing tree cover on the site. <br />With these requirements, staff recommends approval of the variance to impervious surface, noting that <br />the narrow configuration of the site, the existing of the stormwater facilities on the site, the extensive <br />natural landscape on the east side of the property, and the ability to manage new stormwater impacts <br />based on the City Engineer’s recommendations, mitigate concerns that would otherwise be of issue. <br />Land Use <br />The site is zoned R-4, Multi-Family Residential, consisting of 0.86 acres of land. The R-4 Zoning District <br />includes multi-family development as a permitted use up to 20 units per acre, and further allows <br />development for senior housing of up to 40 units per acre by Conditional Use Permit. Assisted living <br />facilities qualify as senior housing under the City’s land use regulations. There are several conditions <br />required for such housing, as follows: <br />1. 75% of parking supply is required to be underground. <br />2. Parking supply totals 1.1 spaces per unit. <br />3. The facility is on a collector street, or has alternative transit options arranged for tenants. <br />4. Unit sizes below standard City requirements must identify a transitional plan supporting <br />redesign if the facility changes to a general market facility. <br />5. Density is limited to between 20 and 40 units per acre. <br />6. Additional necessary conditions related to the Comprehensive Plan or local conditions. <br />Regarding Items 1 and 2 for this project, the applicant is seeking a variance from the parking design and <br />supply requirements, based on an assisted living model in which tenants will not be able to drive or have <br />personal vehicles. Minimum parking development on-site is proposed to provide space for residents <br />and occasional visitors. Additional comment on parking supply is provided below. <br />For Item 3, the facility is located on Foss Road, which serves as a minor collector roadway. <br />Transportation for tenants to other locations is necessarily handled by outside parties. To ensure that <br />this aspect of the conditions is complied with, considering the low supply of on-site parking, staff will <br />recommend that the facility maintains a policy prohibiting tenants from storing personal vehicles on the <br />property. <br />For Item 4, the unit sizes are shown to be between 336 square feet and 552 square feet in area. The <br />zoning district requires that one-bedroom units are at least 650 square feet is size, but for the allowance <br />for smaller senior units as proposed. In this case, the applicant has indicated that a conversion plan – in <br />the event that the facility ceased to serve only senior/assisted tenants – would likely be the removal of <br />walls combining two units into one, reducing the unit count on the property to 17 total units, and <br />remodeling those to meet the new need. As designed, this conversion would meet the requirements of <br />the ordinance if it were to become a reality. <br />For item 5, density at 40 units per acre would accommodate a total of 34.4 units. As such, the proposed <br />34-unit facility fits within the required range. <br />Finally, for Item 6, comments are added to the sections below related to specific issues. <br />24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.