CC PACKET 06102025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 13, 2025 Page 6 5.1 The applicant constructs the building, with all façade exposures and roofline, as 2 proposed, subject to final staff review and approval. The plans as submitted for the 3 Planning Commission meeting on April 15, 2025, are deemed to meet this condition 4 as recommended by staff. 6.5 The applicant works with the City to sign the emergency vehicle lane along Foss 6 Road for no parking. 7.7 The City Engineer reviews and approves the grading and drainage plans. Substantive 8 modifications to the site plan resulting from grading plan changes may result in 9 additional official review of the proposed plan. 8.10 The City Engineer approves required final designs of the bioretention and other 11 aspects of the stormwater (and other) plans as noted in the Engineer’s memo of April 12 3, 2025, and any subsequent Engineer’s review. 9.13 The weed-barrier material under the deck is pervious fabric to ensure compliance 14 with impervious surface regulations. 10.15 Additional landscaping plant materials are provided in the rock mulch edge along the 16 south side of the building to help mitigate impacts of the lessened setback in this area. 17 The updated plans reflect compliance with this condition. 11.18 The applicant supplements landscape plans with the recommendations of the City 19 Engineer and as suggested in this report. 12.20 Additional sustainability elements recommended by the Planning Commission and 21 approved by the City Council may be included in any final approval. 13.22 The proposed sign will be reviewed separately and permitted under standard sign 23 permitting procedures. 14.24 The applicant constructs the project consistent with the finally approved plans. 15.25 The applicant enters into a Conditional Use Permit Development Agreement 26 guaranteeing the terms of the permit and operational elements. 16.27 The approval recommendation incorporates the findings of fact and as included in the 28 draft City Council Resolution. 17.29 Any additional recommendations of the City Council. 30 31 Mr. Grittman reviewed the Findings. Also provided for City Council review are the presentation, 32 application materials, and resolution. Alternative Council action include motion to deny the CUP 33 and/or variances. In the event of a recommendation for denial, the City Council must state its 34 findings related to denial on the record. Council may request additional information and table 35 action. A motion to table should be accompanied by the specific information requested of staff or 36 the developer necessary to make a final decision. 37 38 Councilmember Randle asked who currently owns the land, and Mr. Grittman stated Sheldon 39 Mortenson. 40 41 Councilmember Jenson asked if these were all efficiency apartments. Mr. Grittman stated that 42 each of the rooms does not have a full kitchen. Councilmember Jenson asked what if the demand 43 for assisted living goes away and the building is empty with no parking. Mr. Grittman stated that 44 one of the conditions involves changing the use of the site would require a re-application to the 45 City. Councilmember Jenson referred to the setback and the fact that we are trying to squeeze 46 something into a very tight spot. He asked if it could be done without the setback variance. Mr.