Laserfiche WebLink
September 9, 2025 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 2 <br />ordinance were adopted, the risk would be reduced due to the fact that more clarity is included. He also <br />thinks, without knowing the facts of what is going on in the City today, that if use is not allowed, it is <br />prohibited. The current ordinance defines what is a dwelling unit. <br />Mayor Webster stated that City Manager Yunker has also clarified. Currently, it is not specified that this <br />is allowed, and we are making it clearer. <br />Councilmember Doolan arrived at the meeting at 5:40 p.m. <br />Councilmember Randle asked if this is currently covered by an ordinance. Mr. Yunker stated that it is not <br />expressly written as something that is allowed in the R-1 District. This is added language as a <br />clarification. Mr. Lindgren reviewed the definition of a motel/hotel. Councilmember Randle asked what <br />would happen to those short-term rentals that are currently occurring in the City. Mayor Webster stated <br />Council would need to decide how to handle those. Some may have never applied for a rental license. <br />Mayor Webster asked Mr. Lindgren if, if this ordinance is passed, Council could look at an effective date <br />for properties that currently have a rental license and a tighter termination date for those properties <br />that do not have a rental license. Mr. Lindgren stated that when someone has a land use that is not <br />currently allowed, the law allows that land use to be a valid non-conforming land use. It is ok to have a <br />land use that is consistent with the current zoning code if that land use was consistent with the code <br />when it was created. A delayed effective date could be implemented. That would be having an <br />extraordinary right. A policy decision would be made to allow them to exist for a period of time. <br />Councilmember Jenson asked if we could find out if there are uses that are acting as an Airbnb, but they <br />are not licensed. Do we know the full scope of the number? Mr. Grittman stated the City knows of some <br />of them that have been licensed to operate short-term rentals. We do not know if we are aware of all. <br />Code compliance staff have been out there observing what they normally observe. They have looked at <br />websites that manage these units. He assumes the Staff does not know all of them. Councilmember <br />Jenson asked if there was an approximate number. City Staff is aware of 7 properties. Staff has not <br />researched how many of the 60 rental licenses in the City are being rented short-term. <br />Councilmember Doolan asked about creating extraordinary rights. If Council goes forward with the ban, <br />is the City opening itself up to possible litigation by allowing some but no more beyond that? Mr. <br />Lindgren stated that any action is subject to litigation. If the Council chooses for some to continue, that <br />right is not being taken away from anyone else. Mr. Lindgren stated that if those operating with a <br />license are treated one way and those operating without a license are treated another way, that may <br />cause grounds for litigation, as they are being treated differently. Councilmember Doolan asked if we <br />allow the ones that are licensed to exist, can we put in a structure to accommodate those that are not <br />licensed? Mr. Lindgren, if we created a time period for the 7 to continue, would different procedures <br />need to be developed? Generally, our residential rental license doesn’t ask the question about whether <br />it is a short-term rental or not. Municipal mistake is not an excuse. More procedures would not need to <br />be put into place. The rental license application may need to be revised. <br />Councilmember Elnagdy asked if we were to allow the 7 properties that exist and are adjacent, and <br />require additional monitoring, the additional cost would be incurred from the additional monitoring and <br />would cost the property owner more. Mr. Lindgren stated that the licensing should match the cost of <br />doing something. A different fee structure could be adopted. <br />Councilmember Jenson asked if we implement this ordinance as is, would we allow a grace period to <br />become compliant, allow continuation for a period of time, and allow the obligations they currently