CC WS PACKET 09232025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

September 9, 2025 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 3 have. Councilmember Doolan added that that is what she was trying to say. Councilmember Jenson asked if that would be long-term or forever, or a timeframe from the day the ordinance was passed. Councilmember Doolan stated there would be two options. Councilmember Jenson stated that the person renting short-term can rent long-term instead. Mr. Grittman stated that the ordinance says that short-term rentals should cease, and some enforcement action would be taken to ensure that they do so. Their options would be to convert those properties to long-term rentals or sell the properties. Councilmember Doolan stated that St. Anthony is not the only City looking at this, and is staff aware of any litigation taking place? Mr. Lindgren stated he is aware of two pieces of litigation pending, which are currently scheduled for motions, where the Cities are seeking a motion for summary judgment. They are scheduled for December 2025. In those cities, they do not have an ordinance in place to define what a dwelling unit is. The City has the power to protect the community. The City is within its rights to regulate it in this manner. Mayor Webster stated this is not allowed in an R-1 district and asked if this excludes hotels. Mr. Lindgren stated in R-1 dwelling units are allowed, and they must be a place of residence. Dwelling units do not include motels. A motel is a place for overnight accommodations and transient guests. A short- term rental is like a motel and is not allowed in the R-1 district. Mayor Webster stated this ordinance would make that clearer. Mayor Webster asked the Councilmembers for their thoughts on the proposed ordinance. Councilmember Elnagdy stated her concerns included making rules that would remove rights from property owners. There are a certain number of licensed properties, and she asked Mr. Grittman of the 7 found on Airbnb how many are licensed. Mr. Grittman stated he does not know for sure. Mr. Yunker stated that it is not many. Councilmember Elnagdy stated that if our concern is making sure that investors don’t come in and buy a bunch of properties. There should be carve-outs for well-maintained properties. The more we carve out individuals, other individuals would say what about me. The City would have a good argument there. It is reasonable for licensed residents to follow the rules and maintain the property well. Do we want to handle those that exist and do what we want them to do differently? Banning going forward would be fine, but why get rid of those doing what we want them to do? Councilmember Randle asked what the Council is trying to solve. Are we trying to solve an issue that doesn’t exist, or does it exist? He is not clear on what is being done. He could see moving forward if we want to cap the number of short-term licenses. Those without licenses need to go. But for those who are licensed and doing things the right way, why would we want to interfere with that? Councilmember Doolan stated that it is a good question. We don’t want investment companies to come in and purchase properties. One of the main concerns is to continue to let this grow, as it is taking those properties out of those available for people to purchase and live in St. Anthony. She does not know how to handle those who are unaware of the restrictions and let them continue to operate. Councilmember Jenson stated he would favor this being implemented and creating a grace period to allow people a reasonable time to adjust to a long-term rental. Those operating without a license should not be rewarded with a grace period. If ownership of the property changes, the license would be revoked. People want to live in St. Anthony. Councilmember Randle asked what if people can’t afford to own, and renting is the only option they have.