Laserfiche WebLink
September 9, 2025 St. Anthony Council Work Session - 4 <br />Mayor Webster stated that whether you own or rent a home, a residence is provided for 365 days. This <br />allows an option. She is in favor of moving forward with the ordinance, but is also comfortable if we had <br />timelines for ending them and allowing more time for properties that have a rental license. She is <br />concerned with the properties that did not obtain a rental license. She is not in favor of a grace period <br />for those properties. <br />Councilmember Elnagdy stated she does not have any strong feelings against us doing as we did with <br />the tobacco licenses. We do not need to have short-term licenses going forward. She would like to know <br />how many properties are operating on a short-term basis and are licensed. We need to figure out the <br />exact number and how they are being utilized. Then carve out an exception if Council sees a need for <br />one. More discussion about the licensed rental properties that operate on a short-term basis. If you <br />apply for a rental license, it does not make a distinction between short and long-term rentals. Mr. <br />Yunker stated there is an annual licensing process. Enforcement can start at the next cycle. The City will <br />know through that process who is renting short-term vs. long-term. <br />Councilmember Doolan stated that if we do allow specific ones to continue, what happens when we hit <br />the cap for long-term rentals? Mr. Lindgren stated the safest thing would be to have a cap and have <br />exceptions during the grace period. <br />Councilmember Elnagdy noted that currently, a license does not pass to a new property owner. <br />Mr. Yunker stated that the ordinance, with the cap in place, would allow staff to start to educate those <br />who are operating without a license. <br />Mayor Webster asked the Councilmembers about whether to have a different grace period for licensed <br />rentals operating short-term rentals. Councilmember Randle stated he believes that if they are doing <br />things the right way with licenses, he has difficulty prohibiting it. Councilmember Jenson stated he is in <br />favor of passing the ordinance, including some verbiage about the grace period. Mr. Yunker stated that <br />it does not need to be in the ordinance, but would be staff direction. Councilmember Elnagdy stated she <br />would be in favor of a carve-out for current licenses operating on a short-term basis. She wants to see <br />some license holders who are doing as the City wants, to be grandfathered in. Only Councilmembers <br />Elnagdy and Doolan were in favor of a carve-out. Councilmember Randle stated he would be interested <br />in a carve-out. Mayor Webster asked about the impact on neighbors of the transient use of a property. <br />Councilmember Elnagdy stated she would be in favor of that. Councilmember Jenson stated he wants to <br />get people to buy or rent long-term homes. Mr. Lindgren reviewed Mayor Webster’s suggestion, and <br />everyone who was licensed now could continue through the end of their license period, but if that <br />licensed property was adjacent to the primary residence of the owner, it could continue indefinitely on <br />an annual licensure basis. Mr. Lindgren stated that two classes should not be developed. Mr. Lindgren <br />stated that it would be defensible. Mayor Webster stated that if there was a grandfather clause for a <br />current property, what would happen if someone wanted to buy the property next door and do this? <br />Mr. Lindgren stated that none of these should have happened, and there needs to be a fair way to solve <br />the situation. Councilmember Elnagdy stated she is in favor of a carve-out. <br />The license application would be modified to include short-term or long-term rentals. Mr. Yunker stated <br />that after a license is granted, the Staff does not know the terms of the rentals. Councilmember Jenson <br />asked if the three who came into the Council meetings were licensed. Mr. Grittman stated that the only <br />ones who would qualify for a carve-out are the property owners who live adjacent to the rental <br />property. Mayor Webster cited a possible situation where an unlicensed property owner could be