CC WS PACKET 06242025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

code, any stay at a residential location less than 30 days is not allowable in residential areas, but allowable in commercial areas, via hotels or motels. Mr. Corneille asked what is the goal of considering prohibitions on short-term rentals. Mr. Corneille noted the importance of flexibility for property owners, recognizing that selling is not always viable or feasible. Ms. Doolan noted the importance of NOAH for the community, explaining that it’s important for individuals who work in the City should be able to live in the City. There was some discussion regarding the supply and demand of the housing, and speculation of what drives markets. Mr. Jenson stated that any ordinance would not take away, but try to maximize opportunities for single family homeowners. Mr. Corneille stated that other approaches could be considered to regulate both short- and long-term rentals, such as renter protections and support for housing assistance voucher holders. Mr. Yunker noted that all options need to consider staff capacity as well as potential impacts to the levy. Mr. Yunker stated that a 10 percent cap on single-family rentals would be consistent with other communities and puts safeguards in place, which could be revisited if needed. Ms. Hark noted the importance of being proactive and consistent with other communities. Ms. Hark further noted that if the City is the only community that does not establish regulation, then they could be a target for further future risk, and further noted that a 10 percent cap appears reasonable. There was some discussion of short-term housing as an amenity. The group discussed prioritization between short-term and long-term rentals and that a cap can be a tool to monitor. The group generally agreed to develop ordinance language related to prohibiting large corporate ownership, prohibiting short term rentals, and proposing a 10 percent cap on long term rentals. Mayor Webster thanked everyone for their time and excused the attending Planning Commission Members. The group took a brief break at 6:56 p.m. B.Cannabis Dispensary Update At 7:10 p.m. Mayor Webster welcomed back the Council and guests. Following introductions, Mr. Larson welcomed the team to the discussion to explore a retail cannabis store. Mr. Larson explained that the state cannabis law has resulted in an opportunity for municipalities to regulate the sale of cannabis, but per state law, cannabis needs to be in a separate store from liquor. Mr. Larson then explained that tonight’s discussion is to consider the concept only. If the Council is generally supportive of the concept, the Council will have further opportunities to discuss the potential store at future meetings. Mr. Larson further explained that because of the role the Municipal Liquor Stores play in the community, to regulate the sale of alcohol, extending the municipal retail operations to include cannabis is a reasonable consideration. Mr. Larson discussed the importance of the Municipal Liquor Stores, both as a source of revenue for a small city, as well as a community gathering space. Mr. Larson then explained that trends in the consumption of alcohol has impacted the Municipal Liquor Stores, but the stores have continued to profit, in large part because of the sale of THC and CBD beverages at the liquor stores. The group discussed the importance of extending the success, strong customer service and city values from the Municipal Liquor Stores to a potential Municipal Cannabis Store. Ms. Tuominen explained the importance of establishing one cohesive brand for the existing municipal, and any future stores. Mr. Randle left the meeting at some point during the discussion. Mr. Larson then shared the site concept, with the proposed site located at 3803 Stinson Blvd, a property currently owned by the City. Mr. Yunker explained that while the state laws have created an 4