CC PACKET 12092025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 Nicole A. DeDeyn From:Dr. Bibi Neumann <drbibineumann@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, December 6, 2025 8:29 AM To:Charlie Yunker; SA City Cc:Carl Neumann Subject:Public Comments for December 9, 2025 City Council Meeting Dear City Manager Yunker, City Clerk and Council Members, I am submitting written public comments for the December 9, 2025 City Council Meeting. The City’s online public comment form currently returns a 404 error, so I am providing these comments by email to ensure they are included in the meeting packet and made part of the public record. Please attach the comments below to the agenda items as labeled. VI.A – Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes (11-25-2025) I urge the City to ensure that meeting minutes accurately capture the full substance and context of resident testimony, consistent with Minn. Stat. §§ 13.03, 13.04, and 138.17. When racial, identity-based, or equity-relevant details are omitted or softened, the resulting record becomes less accurate and less useful to future auditors, investigators, policymakers, and courts. The public record is not only for this Council—it is part of the City’s legal and historical archive. It must reflect the lived realities and differential impacts residents describe, especially when those impacts relate to safety, equity, or patterns of disparate treatment. Omissions of context—intentional or structural—produce an incomplete documentary trail that limits the ability of oversight bodies such as the Office of the Legislative Auditor (OLA), Office of the State Auditor (OSA), and Minnesota Department of Administration Data Practices Office (DPO) to assess compliance and accountability. Accurate, contextual minutes are essential to preventing the erasure of facts that matter. Please continue ensuring that City Council minutes summarize not only votes but also the key questions, considerations, and resident concerns raised during meetings. Narrative-style minutes help the public understand how decisions are made and maintain transparency for those unable to attend in person. VI.B – Licenses and Permits Licensing decisions shape neighborhood conditions and carry equity implications. Under Minn. Stat. § 13.03, the City’s documentation should clearly reflect the standards applied, the considerations evaluated, and the community context in which decisions were made. Transparent rationale—especially when cumulative impacts or demographic factors are relevant—helps prevent administrative records from obscuring how decisions affect different groups differently. Future reviewers should be able to understand not only whether a license complied with technical requirements, but whether broader equity, safety, and land-use concerns were meaningfully considered. When licenses and permits are approved, I encourage the City to provide clear public-facing explanations of how these decisions align with zoning, safety, and equity goals. This helps residents understand the standards applied and supports consistency and fairness. 194