Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />August 8, 2006 <br />Page 4 <br />1 Motion by Councilmember Horst seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Ordinance 006- <br />2 004, an Ordinance amending Chapter 5 of the City Code, Being the Licenses, Permits and <br />3 Business Regulations. <br />4 <br />5 Councilmember Stille commented he is for the recycle change; his only concern is with the <br />6 larger container and a resident's ability to comply with ordinances to keeping containers out of <br />7 view. He believes the Council should put some thought into this and suggested the haulers <br />8 educate and perhaps subsidize enclosures for the containers. <br />9 <br />10 Mayor Faust stated if residents are in violation they need to be aware the Fire Department would <br />11 be notified of code violations. <br />12 <br />13 Motion carried unanini.ou�l o <br />■ lee rier�r <br />14 <br />15 Mayor Faust stated the final reading would be at August 26, 2006 meeting. <br />16 <br />17 C. Resolution 06-067A; IRejecting the Bid for the Foss Road Lift Station_ <br />18 <br />19 Mr. Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, Inc., reported on the Foss Road Lift Station and Utility <br />20 Improvement project bids. Mr. Hubmer reported receiving four (4) bids for the Lift Station <br />21 Improvement project and two (2) bids for the Utility project. <br />22 <br />23 Mr. Hubmer informed the Council the engineer's estimate for the Foss Lift Station. was <br />24 $600,000; however, the low bid was $848,500, approximately $250,000 more than the engineer's <br />25 estimate. Mr. Hubmer then stated the engineer's estimate for the Utility Improvement Project <br />26 was approximately $906,000 and the low bid received was $1,343,649; approximately $440,000 <br />27 over the engineer's bid. Mr. Hubmer reported six contractors stated they were too busy to <br />28 submit a bid or it did not fit into their current work program and some did not want to bid <br />29 because it included a building be constructed over the lift station. <br />30 <br />31 Mr. Hubmer recommended, based on the small number of bids received and the high bid prices <br />32 received, City Council reject all bids for the Foss Lift Station and Utility Improvements projects. <br />33 He recommended revising the bid package to provide a building alternate that includes the <br />34 options of a building added to the lift station, no building and the third option of j ust some cover <br />35- in the location of the lift station. <br />36 <br />37 Mr. Hubmer suggested a better approach and value for the City would be, due to pricing on the <br />38 pipe bursting and the underground tunneling work, to open the streets, replace it from curb to <br />39 curb and put in a new water main and sanitary sewer. He stated this could be done for the same <br />40' price as the pipe bursting technology estimate. Mr. Hubmer believes this is a prudent choice <br />41 given the condition of the roads. <br />42 <br />43 Councilmember Thuesen asked if rejected, what time line does the Council have before it needs <br />44 to deal with this. <br />45 <br />