My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08222006
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2006
>
CC PACKET 08222006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 11:24:13 AM
Creation date
5/7/2014 2:29:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />August 8, 2006 <br />Page 5 <br />I Mr. Hubmer indicated he would like to do the Lift Station improvements this winter. He stated <br />2 he spoke with the contractors about some uncertainties and some risk in specifications where the <br />3 contractor could feel comfortable coming down in price without making large assumptions. Mr. <br />4 Hubmer would like to bid the lift station portion and the forcemain that leaves the station and <br />5 goes to Roseville next month. <br />6 <br />7 Commissioner Thuesen asked if the current system, would continue to work and serve. the <br />8 residents until a better bid was received. <br />9 <br />10 Mr. Hubmer replied the Silver Lake village Redevelopment Project area would drive the <br />11 situation. He stated there is currently adequate capacity for the buildings in the area. Mr. Hubmer <br />12 stated by the time the next phase for the condo units comes on line; he would like to start the <br />13 project. Mr. Hubmer stated there has been some control issues at the lift station and maintenance <br />14 concerns and the need for replacement is due to the age of system. <br />15 <br />16 Mayor Faust asked why the bids came in so high. <br />17 <br />18 Mr. Hubmer replied there was not a very competitive environment and contractors were busy. He <br />19 also stated the building over the lift station was an issue for the contractors. <br />20 <br />21 Mayor Faust asked if Mr. Hubmer thought by separating the projects, bidders would better <br />22 understand specifications and costs. <br />23 <br />24 Mi. Hubmer replied yes and they could clarify items better. He stated they bid four lift stations <br />25 similar to the St. Anthony lift station this past year. He indicated the only difference was the <br />26 others did not have a building. <br />27 <br />28 Mayor Faust asked Mr. Hubmer what size structure would be over the lift station and if he had <br />29 talked to the building owners in the area. <br />30 <br />31 Mr. Hubmer replied the building size would be about 37 feet by 24 feet. He reported talking to <br />32 the property and building owner and sharing the plans with them.. Mr. Hubmer stated the best <br />33 situation would be to have the lift station in a building because when something goes wrong, it is <br />34 usually during bad weather. He stated there could also be a scaled-down building or an add-on to <br />35 the project so the bid would be for the lift station and the panels only. He stated this would help <br />36 determine where to go budget wise. <br />37 <br />38 Motion by Councilniember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approve Resolution 06- <br />39 067A; a Resolution rejecting the bids for the Foss Road Lift Station Improvement and the Foss <br />40 Road Lift Station Utility Improvement projects. <br />41 <br />42 Motion carried unanimous <br />43 <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.