Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />September 26, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br />1 Assistant City Administrator Moore -Sykes stated the only area she could find where pup trucks <br />2 were used to collect garbage was mostly used in the Western States where residents lived in the <br />3 foothills and or mountain areas of their communities. She stated the pup trucks were used in <br />4 these areas to save on wear and tear of the larger trucks. She mentioned these residents were also <br />5 charged on average, an additional $5.00 per pick up. <br />6 <br />7 Assistant City Administrator Moore -Sykes reported that single -sort recycling programs appear to <br />8 be responsible for an increased amount of recyclable materials collected, thereby resulting in <br />9 coming closer to reaching the recycling goals the State of Minnesota charged counties and cities <br />10 with over 20 years ago. She indicated in a report submitted by the Roseville City Council in May <br />11 2002, a citizen's advisory committed reported they found significant increases, between 15% and <br />12 30%, in recycling participation by residents in communities where single -sort recycling had been <br />13 implemented. <br />14 <br />15 Assistant City Administrator Moore -Sykes reported more recent surveys by other cities <br />16 confirmed the earlier findings. Stated North St. Paul found that recycling participation by <br />17 resident increased about 3 5%; Shoreview found an increase between 3 0% and 40%; and New <br />18 Brighten, considering single -sort recycling, estimates a 15% increase in recyclable material <br />19 collection. <br />20 <br />21 Assistant City Administrator Moore -Sykes reported the negative aspects of single -sort recycling <br />22 include customers considering single -sort could see an increase in their monthly costs of between <br />23 seven and nine percent. She stated haulers reported the increase would be due to increased labor <br />24 costs in sorting the recyclables at their facilities and some haulers have included a fuel surcharge <br />25 that is passed along to their customers. <br />26 <br />27 Assistant City Administrator Moore -Sykes reported another negative impact was garbage being <br />28 added to the recyclable materials that contaminated recyclables, making them unusable. She <br />29 stated haulers would then claim the whole truckload contaminated and would send it to the <br />30 landfill. She reported the State of Minnesota had since implemented regulations to control this <br />31 and have aggressively enacted an education program for their customers. <br />32 <br />33 Assistant City Administrator Moore -Sykes reported the issue of glass appears to be more of an <br />34 issue between the haulers, the counties and the end users of recycled glass. She stated some <br />35 would not take the mixed colored glass. <br />36 <br />37 Assistant City Administrator Moore -Sykes stated Council asked Staff to research the question of <br />38 whether or not the City should require multi -family residences provide recycling to their tenants. <br />39 She stated Ramsey County advised Staff they were very interested in having the owners of multi - <br />40 family units participate in a recycling program which would bring the City into compliance with <br />41 County policy that states all residents are to have the opportunity to recycle. <br />42 <br />43 Assistant City Administrator Moore -Sykes reported the City Ordinance required curbside <br />44 recycling for the R-1, R-2 and R-3 zoning districts, however it was silent on the R-4 zoning <br />45 district. She mentioned Ramsey County cites of Mounds View, New Brighton, Shoreview, and <br />46 White Bear Lake have recycling ordinances requiring multi -family complexes participate in <br />