My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 01092007
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2007
>
CC PACKET 01092007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 11:07:27 AM
Creation date
5/7/2014 2:21:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting 'Minutes <br />December 11 r 2006 <br />Page 4. <br />1 - C. Resolution 06-095 • ApWoving Revised Contract for Police Services for Lauderdale. <br />3 City Manager Morrison informed Council that the 'City of Lauderdale has re uested an increase <br />4 in police coverage from 16 to 24 hours. He indicated the cost for the three-year .contract would <br />5 be $519,000 in 2007, $548,100 in 2008, and $57.8,250 in 2009 <br />6 <br />7 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to adoptt Resolution 06- <br />8 095, a Resolution Amending the Joint Powers Agreement for Police Services with the City of <br />9 Lauderdale with Increasing the Contract Hours to 24 Hours From 15 Hours he p <br />Contingent upon <br />g <br />10 Approval of the Amended Joint Powers Agreement by the City of Lauderdale. <br />11 -- <br />12 Motion carried unanimous!y. <br />13 <br />14 Mayor Faust stated it was his understanding the City of Lauderdale approved the budget for the <br />15 increased police coverage and would approve the .Joint Powers Agreement. <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 D. Resolution 06-096; Authorizing the Sale and Issuance of Variable Rate Demand <br />19 Multifamily Houses Revenue Bonds (The Landings at Silver Lake Village Project), <br />20- Series 2006; Establishing the Security therefore and Authorizing the Execution of <br />21 Documents. <br />22 <br />23 City. Attorney Lindgren stated resolution 06-096 deals with the financing for the Landings at <br />• g g <br />24 Silver Lake Village residential area. He reported the developer currently has three series of multi <br />25 family housing bonds out. He stated the resolution is a. refunding vehicle for a debt <br />26 consolidation under which the City has already participated. He explained the financing is not a <br />27 liability of the City, but a conduit financing that allows the developer to use afinanoing structure <br />28 that allows thein to have a portion of the debt be on a tax exempt basis where the interest earned <br />29 on the bonds is not taxed by the Federal Government. He explained the debt services on the <br />30 bond are paid solely by the borrower with no liability with respect to the bond by the City. <br />31 <br />32 City Attorney Lindgren explained the documents being. roved in the resolution relate to <br />app <br />33 $6,400,000 of multi family housing bonds that would refund one of the existing series ofbonds <br />34 previously approved by the City Council. He stated the reason the developer wants to do this is <br />35 that they found a lender that would save them effort in how this is handled in addition to the cost <br />36 savings. He mentioned it is not in essence a new debt, but a tool to do what was already <br />37 approved by City Council. <br />38 <br />39 Mayor Faust restated this is not .a liability to the City; rather it is being a good partner in Silver <br />g <br />40 Lake Village and the business that is already there. <br />41 <br />42 Councilmember Stille stated this adds value to theproverty,which is ood for the Ci . He <br />. g ty. <br />43 mentioned this is a conduit that the City provides for lower rates than in the open market. He <br />44 stated it appears the reason the developer is able to do this is because they took the construction <br />45- and up risk out, which enabled them to find more favorable rates. <br />46 <br />A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.