Laserfiche WebLink
30 <br />CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />RESOLUTION NO. 07-055 <br />RESOLUTION RELATING TO FINDINGS MADE BY CITY COUNCIL ON <br />JUNE 26, 2007 CONCERNING RESOLUTION 07-049. <br />WHEREAS, the City received a Conditional Use Permit application (the "Application") <br />for a monopole cell phone tower from Midwest Real Estate Services, Inc. and a public hearing <br />was held before the Planning Commission on June 19; 2007; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use <br />Permit and the corresponding Resolution 07-049 was presented to the City Council for its <br />consideration at its June 26, 2007 meeting; and <br />WIIEREAS, the City Council heard from the Applicant and other interested parties on <br />June 26, 2007 which resulted in the City Council making several Findings concerning the <br />Application; and <br />WIIEREAS, on June 26, 2007 the City Council determined that its Findings were <br />sufficient under Section 1680.06, subd. 3 of the City Code and voted to deny adoption of <br />Resolution 07-049; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council concluded, among other things, that denial of the <br />Resolution would not preclude the Applicant from locating a cell phone tower in its desired area <br />and would not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting operation of a cell phone system; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council desires to record the Findings on which its denial was <br />based through adoption of this Resolution. <br />NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of St. Anthony, Minnesota as <br />follows: <br />Following public comment and analysis by the City Council on June 26, 2007, the <br />City Council voted to deny approval of Resolution 07-049, in substantive part, <br />based on the following Findings: <br />1. Sections 1680.01 through 1680.09 of the City Code (the "Code") <br />regulates, consistent with the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, the <br />locating of wireless telecommunications services within the City. <br />2. The Application fails to meet the requirements of the Code because, at a <br />minimum: <br />