Laserfiche WebLink
a. The Application fails to satisfy the purposes of Section 1680.02 <br />because the Application: (i) does not demonstrate that it protects residential areas <br />from potential adverse impacts; (ii) does not minimize adverse visual impacts; <br />(iii) does not promote and encourage collocation of towers; and (iv) does not <br />ensure that the tower is compatible with surrounding land uses. <br />b. The Application fails to address the legitimate preference given <br />under Section 1680.04, subd. 1 and in Section 1680.05 to location of towers <br />within light industrial zoning districts and to identify an alternative site within a <br />light industrial zoning district. <br />C. The Application fails to meet the requirements of Section 1680.04, <br />subd. 2 regarding concealing or camouflaging a tower and Section 1680.04, subd. <br />3 regarding landscaping options for screening a tower. <br />d. The Application fails to meet the requirements of Section 1680.04, <br />subd. 10 regarding the analysis of collocation opportunities within the one-half <br />mile radius identified in the Code. <br />e. The Application failed to provide all the required information <br />under Section 1680.06, subd. 2. <br />f. The Application failed to meet other requirements of the Code, <br />each of which are memorialized within the record of the June 26, 2007 City <br />Council meeting. <br />Adopted this 14th day of Ammst, 2007. <br />Af'fP;S'f: <br />City Clerk <br />Reviewed for administration: <br />Mayor <br />City Manager <br />31 <br />