CC PACKET 09092008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

24 On 11/16/07, 1 met with the SAPD regarding a reported dog bite. I complied with the SAPD b}, quarantining the dog, producing the St. Anthony dog license, and paperwork showing all current vaccinations. RP/Towle stated he was bit at approximately 10:30 AM on 11/16/07, but called the police at 12:10 PM to make a report of a dog bite over the phone. I spoke with illy neighbor Merril, who stated RP/Towle called her and told her that her dog was out. Merril stated it was not her dog. RP/Towle called back to Merril and stated to her the dog had bitten him. I spoke to RP/Towle, who told me he was bit by my dog. I asked RP/Towte if we could meet so I could see the injury, and lie stated no, he was fine. RP/Towle called me two weeks later stating he wanted my homeowners insurance information. RP/"Towle stated lie could file a claim with my insurance and it would not hurt my insurance or the status of the dog. RP/Towle stated this happened to his brother and he collected money from the insurance company. I infomcd RP/Towle without proof of an injury I was not wilting to give out this information. RP/Towle stated lie needed fifteen hundred dollars from me for an MRI because his back was now hurting and he could not. walk, at which point I told him no. An attorney contacted me in a letter stating he wanted my insuance information or I would be sued. 1 replied to the Attorney in the letter, stating I needed proof of this injury, at which point they did not pursue it any further. Regarding the police report taken on 06/2.6/08, St. Anthony City Ordinance Section 1130 states that peddlers and solicitors must obtain a license from dile city. Registration and its conditions are required by the City of St. Anthony. Violation of this Ordinance is considered trespassing. Mr. Mcelhose and Mr. Ralls are in violation of our City's Ordinance that requires solicitors and peddlers to obtain a license. Due to this fact, Mr. Mcelhose was in fact in violation of a City Ordinance and in fact illegally on my property. It should also be noted that I did speak to both Mr. Mcelhose and Mr. Ralls down the street from my hone. Mr. Ralls told me he told Mr. Mcelhose not to go into the yard because there was a dog there. Mr. Ralls stated he was sorry, he should have stayed with Mr. Mcelhose. Mr. Mcelhose stated to me he went into the yard, saw the dog, and ran. Mr. Mcelhose stated he tripped and fell to the ground, and as the dog came up to him he tried to kick to keep the dog away, and that is when the dog bit him. The State definition for Provocation is an act that an adult could reasonably expect may cause a dog to attack or bite. It is reasonable to expect a dog may bite someone on his own property if in fact he is being kicked.