Laserfiche WebLink
22 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: October 1, 2009 <br />TO: Mayor and Councilmembers <br />FROM: Mike Morrison, City Manager <br />Roger Larson, Finance Director <br />ITEM: TIERED WATER RATES <br />Overview: <br />Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.291 was amended to include a requirement for public <br />water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people to adopt a water rate structure that <br />encourages conservation. <br />To comply with the law, effective 01/01/2010, Cities must implement a tiered system of <br />water rates that charges a higher rate per unit as water usage increases. The conservation <br />rates are for all user groups including residential, multi -family and commercial users of <br />water. <br />To encourage conservation, the DNR recommended the cost should be significant <br />between tiers. A committee was formed and recommended that a 25% increase exist <br />between the first tiers, another 25% increase between the second tier and a 50% increase <br />exist between the last tiers. <br />Currently, St. Anthony has a uniform rate structure where the cost per unit ($2.60 per <br />1,000 gallons) is the same regardless of the volume used. An example of tiered water <br />rates would be as follows: <br />0 — 15,000* <br />15,001 — 22,500 <br />22,501 — 30,000 <br />Over 30,000 Gallons <br />*Minimum bill = $7,500 Gallons <br />Meetings to Date: <br />$2.60 per 1,000 Gallons <br />$2.86 per 1,000 — 10% increase <br />$3.22 per 1,000 —12.5% increase <br />$3.70 per 1,000 — 15% increase <br />The City Council and Staff reviewed tiered water rates at their June lst and August 3rd <br />work sessions. In addition, a presentation and discussion occurred at the August 25`' <br />regular Council Meeting. <br />At that meeting Staff was directed to contact the DNR about a one year extension. A <br />formal letter was sent asking for the extension due to the on-going negotiations to clean <br />up the TCAAP pollutants. This may require force pumping of the water supply with the <br />concern being that conservation may prolong the process of cleaning up the plume. The <br />DNR has denied the request indicating the law does not give the DNR the authority to <br />grant extensions. <br />