My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06082010
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010
>
CC PACKET 06082010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 10:28:28 AM
Creation date
4/30/2014 4:45:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />May 25, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br />2 A. Resolution 10-033; Approving the Request for an Amendment to the Silver Lake Village <br />3 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sign Plan to Allow for the Modification of Existing <br />4 Ground Signs and the Addition of One Directional Ground Sign. Applicant: St. Anthony <br />5 Retail Development. <br />7 Planning Commission Member Craig Poucher reported on the concept review and public hearing <br />8 held by the Planning Commission on the request for an amendment to the Silver Lake Village <br />9 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sign Plan to allow for the modification of existing ground <br />10 signs and the addition of one directional ground sign. He reported that a 41 year resident of the <br />11 City spoke at the public hearing regarding his concerns about safety and clutter resulting from <br />12 the additional signs. Mr. Poucher stated the Planning Commission voted in two separate motions <br />13 on the proposed amendment to the Sign Plan: 1) The first motion was made and approved by <br />14 majority vote, the proposed modification of existing ground signs and the addition of a ground <br />15 sign at 3800 Silver Lake Road; 2) The second motion was made and approved by unanimous <br />16 vote, the addition of a directional sign as proposed by the applicant. <br />17 <br />18 Commissioner Poucher presented the site plan and Photoshop examples of the requested signage. <br />19 <br />20 Commissioner Jenson inquired about the concerns expressed at the public hearing regarding a <br />21 potential obstruction of view. Commissioner Poucher replied that most of this concern was in <br />22 relation to the proposed new directional sign because it is located at an intersection. There could <br />23 also be concern with the proposed location of the new ground sign where traffic will be entering <br />24 the parking lot. <br />25 <br />26 City Manager Morrison clarified that the proposed amendment covers two new signs and <br />27 modifications to two existing signs. <br />28 <br />29 Mr. Dale Wenkus, Vice President of Architecture with Doran Companies, and Ms. Brenda <br />30 Thomas, Vice President of Property Management with Doran Companies, were present to <br />31 answer questions of the City Council. <br />32 <br />33 Councilmember Stille verified with Ms. Thomas that a two foot increase in height is proposed <br />34 for the Cub sign, which includes the one foot addition and one foot cap. <br />35 <br />36 Mr. Wenkus stated for clarification, it is proposed that six feet be added to the Cub sign, which is <br />37 located at the most northerly corner. It is proposed that one foot and a one foot cap be added to <br />38 the sign in front of Smash Burger. The third sign along Silver Lake Road would be similar in <br />39 design to the existing sign in front of Smash Burger. <br />40 <br />41 Mayor Faust questioned why the resolution states a height of 31 feet for the Cub sign while the <br />42 amendment being proposed includes a height of 26 feet. Mr. Wenkus explained that the original <br />43 PUD included approval for a monument sign at a maximum of 31 feet in height at this location. <br />44 It was elected to only put in a sign that is 20 feet high. The request now is for an additional six <br />45 feet in height, which remains within the 31 foot height restriction that was originally included in <br />46 the CUP. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.