My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06082010
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010
>
CC PACKET 06082010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 10:28:28 AM
Creation date
4/30/2014 4:45:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />May 25, 2010 <br />Page 4 <br />1 received by the Planning Commission included the 26 foot dimensions, and this is what was <br />2 approved by the Planning Commission. <br />Ms. Thomas stated Doran Companies understands the walkable feeling of St. Anthony. They are <br />trying to capture the traffic on Silver Lake Road to help support the tenants. <br />7 Mayor Faust stated the City Council wants the center to be successful, but they need to serve the <br />8 future as well as the present. He commented that his relationship with the developer has been <br />9 good and there is every reason to believe this will continue. <br />10 <br />11 Councilmember Stille stated he understands the difficulties with the retail market, that this <br />12 project is tucked away, and that signage is important. He is not opposed to some additional <br />13 signage and appreciates that the landscaping requested by the City on the south side hides the <br />14 signage in this area. Due to this, the monument requested in this area does not bother him. He <br />15 stated his preference for a 24 foot Cub sign as opposed to a 26 foot sign. He stated that signage <br />16 does not do a lot of good in front of Smash Burger as itis difficult to read. <br />17 <br />18 Councilmember Roth commented that the Cub sign jumps out in comparison to the other signs, <br />19 and he had been somewhat opposed to a taller sign in this location. However, the original <br />20 agreement authorized a sign height of 31 feet. He indicated that he will likely support this <br />21 measure, but expressed concern regarding how busy it is getting on Silver Lake Road. <br />22 <br />23 Councilmember Jenson stated he shares some of the comments made about over -signage and <br />24 size. He questioned whether the proposed signage accounts for all of the open tenant space. <br />25 <br />26 Mayor Faust indicated he would be more supportive of a 24 foot Cub sign as opposed to a 26 <br />27 foot sign, and that he could also agree with the sign in front of Smash Burger. He stated his <br />28 position that there is not a valid reason for the directional sign by Freedom Gas Station due to <br />29 traffic flow and safety concerns. He pointed out legislative requirements for the consideration of <br />30 complete streets, taking into account modes of transportation other than automobiles. He <br />31 commented on the possibility of traffic driving north making an impulse turn after seeing this <br />32 sign, resulting in traffic issues. He suggested there are options to consider such as moving <br />33 portions of the amendment request, denial, tabling, or sending the item back to the Planning <br />34 Commission. <br />35 <br />36 Councilmember Stille suggested tabling the item may allow the applicant an opportunity to <br />37 incorporate some of Council's suggestions. He stated his support of amending the PUD <br />38 ordinance to further limit the allowable sign height from the current 31 foot limit. <br />39 <br />40 Mayor Faust suggested sending the item back to the Planning Commission for further review and <br />41 discussion if the item is tabled. <br />42 <br />43 City Manager Mornson indicated it would be preferable that the item come back to the City <br />44 Council in one resolution, rather than the current form of two resolutions. <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.