Laserfiche WebLink
State of the Judiciary: Much Patience Needed in 2011 - Features/Substantive Law - The H... Page 1 of 5 <br />14 <br />Main Page I Search <br />— Fe <br />Association News <br />Features/ Substantive _ <br />Law <br />Spotlight/ Profiles _ <br />Departments <br />Classifieds _ <br />The Hennepin lawyer _ <br />February 16, 2011 <br />TM <br />Nennepin[uimm[fl <br />State of the Judiciary: Much Patience Deeded in <br />2011 <br />Judge James Swenson <br />December 23, 2010 <br />This coming year is likely to be a very difficult one for your <br />Hennepin County District Court and its justice partners. <br />Patience will be required of everyone. <br />Significantly Reduced Judicial Resources <br />The Judicial Council recently decided that we must wait a <br />minimum of four months to fill any judicial vacancies. This <br />presents a big practical problem for us and our justice <br />partners. A study by the Office of the Legislative Auditor <br />determined that Minnesota judges handle approximately 49 Judge Swenson is the chief <br />percent more cases per judge than judges in each of our judge of Minnesota's Fourth <br />neighboring states, plus Illinois, Kansas, and Missouri. Your Judicial District. <br />Hennepin County District Court is even more productive Prirrtahle Version <br />when compared to other large urban courts in America, <br />handling about twice as many cases as judges in comparable <br />large urban counties. According to the newest judicial <br />weighted caseload numbers, your court has at least five <br />fewer judges than it needs to properly perform its work even before we consider the impact of <br />the current and pending vacant positions. Judge Warren Sagstuen retired in September, Judges <br />Tanja Manrique and Stephen Aldrich retired at the end of October, and part-time Judge <br />Hopper retired at the end of December. Another judge reaches mandatory retirement in <br />February 2011 and as many as five or more judges may retire before the end of the second <br />quarter. Depending upon how soon we can fill the seats left vacant by our fall 2010 retirees, <br />we are looking at a very serious judge shortage for a number of months during the first half of <br />2011. The situation is not likely to improve soon as we anticipate additional retirements next <br />summer. <br />Some people suggest that we can fill these vacant positions with senior (retired) judges, but <br />that is not the case. First, the funding formula for employing senior judges only allows us to <br />use senior judges three out of every four days of judicial vacancies. Second, this first round of <br />vacant positions is cropping up during the winter months when many of our senior judges are <br />happily enjoying their retirement in warmer climates. Third, even if we could hire senior <br />judges on a one to one basis, I doubt that we could find enough qualified senior judges to fill <br />our needs. As you no doubt know by now, we have eliminated the master calendar for our <br />criminal cases and all criminal cases are now blocked. This means that we no longer have <br />opportunities for senior judges to fill in on a day to day basis, handle traditional mass <br />calendars, and leave at the end of the day without orders to write and follow-up appearances <br />to handle. Instead, we need committed senior judges to work for extended periods, pick up a <br />significant number of blocked cases, and work those cases like their own. <br />Technological Advances <br />Patience will be needed as well as we roll out our many technological innovations. By the time <br />this article is published, our Civil Division will have commenced its e -filing pilot for new <br />attorney -initiated, major civil cases, officially known as the Civil Electronic Filing Pilot <br />http:l/hennepin.timberlakepublishing.com/article.asp?article=1495&paper=l&cat=147 2/16/2011 <br />