Laserfiche WebLink
State of the Judiciary: Much Patience Needed in 2011 - Features/Substantive Law - The H... Page 2 of 5 <br />15 <br />Project. The pilot is starting with six law firms, and will include case documents such as <br />pleadings, service records, court notices, orders and judgments, and service/collection of any <br />required filing fees. During the pilot stage, e -filing will be limited to test cases, but we <br />anticipate that it will be mandatory for all civil cases sometime in the future. The pilot does <br />not presently include existing civil cases, probate, mental health, conciliation, housing, or <br />family court cases. We intend to phase in e -filing for all other case types and all parties soon. <br />The project began with a dedicated work group who studied seven e -filing providers, including <br />each system's potential compatibility with the Minnesota Court Information System (MNCIS), <br />the court case management system. Tyler Technologies was selected as the vendor to assist <br />with our electronic filing initiative. The work group also solicited participation from a variety <br />of law firms to help us develop a best -process model for the rest of the state. Judges Robert <br />Blaeser and Pete Cahill addressed the HCBA last March 8 and shared information regarding our <br />proposed initiative, gained buy -in, and sought firms interested in participating in the pilot. Six <br />firms that accepted the challenge include Bassford Remele; Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson ft <br />Hornik; Dorsey It Whitney; Faegre 8. Benson; Lindquist 8 Vennum; and Maslon, Edelman, <br />Borman Et Brand. The bench greatly appreciates the interest and commitment shown by these <br />justice partners. <br />E -filing will improve efficiency, plus save paper and postage and file storage space. It will be <br />easy to learn for both court staff (takes only 45 minutes) and those who will e -file their <br />pleadings. When the civil e -filing pilot is finished, all the kinks will have been worked out, and <br />you will enjoy the benefits of a state-of-the-art e -filing system that has been developed with <br />the needs of the bar firmly in mind. Soon after e -filing is up and running for new civil cases, <br />we will expand the initiative to our other courts. These additional rollouts will require more <br />patience as we discover the tweaks and adjustments necessary to meet the needs of these <br />diverse courts and justice partners. <br />Our new court calendar display monitor system—similar to airport flight information monitors— <br />is another technological improvement rolled out in late 2010. The display is located on the <br />wall on the Public Service Level, near the C Tower weapons screening entrance. We have 12 <br />monitors that list court hearing locations by each party's last name. If for some reason a case <br />fails to appear on the monitor or a customer is unable to read English, a phone next to the <br />monitors will offer assistance from Violations Bureau staff. <br />Other technological improvements include a kiosk system for determining public defender <br />eligibility. These kiosks should be in place at all Criminal Division locations by late spring <br />2011. We are currently redesigning our public website, with a view to improving user-friendly <br />access to court information. Also on the horizon are large scale, batch scanning of existing <br />files to facilitate our move to a paperless court; wiring of more courtrooms to expand our <br />digital court record project; and more use of interactive television (ITV). <br />Chief Justice John T. Broderick of New Hampshire recently observed that "innovation is no <br />Longer just a good idea, it is an absolute prerequisite to survival." A growing population of <br />Limited english proficiency (LEP) Minnesota citizens, coupled with difficult economic times, <br />presents challenges. In order to ensure that equal access to justice will continue to be met, <br />Minnesota courts, including the Hennepin County District Court, have developed, trained, and <br />certified a strong base of professional court interpreters. Now that our courts face increasing <br />demands for efficiency and access, we need to rethink our traditional model of court <br />interpreting. <br />Hennepin County District Court has developed and is currently piloting a remote interpretation <br />program. Using state-of-the-art ITV technology, our program allows your court and its partners <br />to improve the availability of certified interpreters throughout the metropolitan area, along <br />with greater Minnesota, while reducing costs to taxpayers, scheduling delays, and travel time. <br />In order to identify optimal best practices, our implementation team carefully studied other <br />state and federal systems that currently rely on remote interpreters. Re-engineering the way <br />our courts provide interpretation services follows the national push for increased efficiency <br />while meeting head-on the reality of limited resources, all without sacrificing quality. In late <br />October we went live with our first cross -district remote interpretation using a Hennepin <br />interpreter to help out in Carver County. It was a big success as noted in the following report <br />from Carver County: <br />Today we had our first remote interpreting session for two bail hearings with Sebastian Mesa as <br />the interpreter. Sebastian Mesa is a Minnesota state certified, Hennepin County staff <br />interpreter. Judge Eide was at the helm of this very successful first remote interpreting <br />http://hetinepiii.tinlberlakeptiblisliing.com/article.asp?articte-1495&paper=l&cat=147 2/16/2011 <br />