CC PACKET 02122013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

February 6, 2013 Page 7 6. Drainage calculations, storm sewer sizing calculations and information regarding the routing of the building downspouts and roof drainage has not been provided by the Applicant. This information must be submitted for review and approval. 7. A RCWD permit must be obtained by the applicant for the proposed development. 3. Ordinance Authority. The property is currently zoned "Planned Unit Development (PUD)". Title XV Land Usage, Chapter 152 Zoning Code, Section 152.206 (A): Revisions and/or Changes (Planned Unit Development) states that: (A) Minor changes in location, placement, and height. Minor changes in the location, placement, and height of structures may be authorized by the Development Review Committee if required by engineering or other circumstances not foreseen at the time the final plan was approved and filed with the Zoning Administrator. The proposal is consistent with the location, placement and height as outlined in the PUD, the Phase III Redevelopment Agreement, and the City's Comprehensive Plan. As such, because it has been a few years since the City has last reviewed development within this PUD, and because the Redevelopment Agreement has been modified throughout the years, although staff has interpreted this to be a "minor change" we have determined that the Council should review the proposed site plan. 4. Conclusions. It appears that the Applicant has submitted adequate information to take action on the requests. From a planning and engineering perspective, it appears that the proposed building and use appropriately fit into the context of the existing and envisioned overall development master plan. The Applicant has done a reasonably good job of detailing the building to help it relate to the overall master plan theme, as well as the other existing buildings within the immediate area. The proposed development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, as well as the Silver Lake Village PUD Final Development Plans and Redevelopment Agreements as previously approved and amended from time to time by the City. POTENTIAL ACTION I. Request Additional Information and Continue the Meeting. The Applicant appears to have provided enough information for the City Council to make a decision to approve or deny the request. Should the City Council request additional information from the Applicant, the City Council should continue the meeting until a later time or send the item back to the Planning Commission for further review. 2. Recommend Approval (with or without conditions). In the event of a recommendation for approval (with or without conditions), the City Council may refer to Exhibit C, and may modify the draft resolution for approval to include any conditions that it deems necessary. 3. Recommend Denial. In the event the City Council chooses denial of the request, it should direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial to be brought back at a later meeting and clearly state its reasons for the denial recommendation. It should be noted however, that this development has been previously reviewed and approved as part of the overall PUD for the area, as well as amended from time to time through the Redevelopment Agreements. While Staff is requesting formal review and approval from the City Council, the proposed development is in line with previous approvals granted for this site and the overall development. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Location Map Exhibit B: Applicant's Application Exhibit C: Draft Resolution — Approving the Site Plan 31