Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />May 14, 2013 <br />Page 2 <br />1 V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF - NONE. <br />2 <br />3 VI. GENERAL 13USINESS OF COUNCIL. <br />4 <br />5 A. Resolution 13-040• a Resolution Accepting Salo Pond Water Quality Improvement <br />6 Project Plans and Specifications and Orderingy Advertising for Bids. Todd Ilubmer, WSB <br />7 & Associates, presenting. <br />9 City Engineer Hubmer explained that Silver Lake has been listed as impaired by the Minnesota <br />10 Pollution Control Agency (MPGA) for excess nutrients and the MPGA, in conjunction with the <br />11 Rice Creek Watershed District, completed a TMDL study that indicates phosphorus needs to be <br />12 reduced by 38.2 pounds per year. He indicated the State's water quality standard for total <br />13 phosphorus is 60 parts per billion and the planned water quality treatment system at Silver Lake <br />14 will improve water quality. He advised the State's standard for Chlorophyll A is 20 micrograms <br />15 per million and Silver Lake has exceeded this standard in almost every year and needs to reduce <br />16 algae production in the lake. He stated the State's goal for average water clarity is <br />17 approximately one meter and over the last three years the City has achieved its water quality goal <br />18 during the summer months but there were five years during which the City did not meet this <br />19 goal. Ile explained the City is proposing to construct a chemical treatment system similar to the <br />20 system used for treating drinking water where chemicals will be added to the lake that attach to <br />21 phosphorus and the water is then filtered out with clean water coming into the south pond of Salo <br />22 Park that gets flushed through to Silver Lake. He stated this treatment will achieve 90% of the <br />23 TMDL goal of reducing 29 pounds of phosphorus per year. He indicated the project will be <br />24 funded up to $150,000 by the MPCA as well as $50,000 by Rice Creek Watershed District and <br />25 the remaining $100,000 being paid by the City. Ile stated the project will have ongoing <br />26 maintenance costs of $15,000-$20,000 per year and will require first year operation costs for <br />27 calibration and monitoring. He noted the City's obligation of $100,000 will come from the <br />28 annual street reconstruction project because the project will meet permitting requirements and <br />29 will allow the City to bank credits for future projects. IIe advised the City is working on final <br />30 plans and specifications and bids will be awarded on June 25°i with submission of bid plans and <br />31 specifications to the MPCA for certification on June 26"i. He stated most utility contractors are <br />32 able to handle this type of project because it involves a system similar to a water treatment plant. <br />33 He indicated construction is not going to start until October or November this year and the <br />34 project will take five to six weeks. <br />35 <br />36 Councilmember Stille asked if there would be noticeable improvements after installation of the <br />37 treatment system. <br />38 <br />39 City Engineer Hubmer replied that the City will see significant improvements in a five or six <br />40 year time period after installation of the treatment system and as a result of the City's carp <br />41 management program. <br />42 <br />43 Mayor Faust pointed out that these improvements are mandatory to meet State standards and the <br />44 requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />45 <br />