Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />MINUTES <br />REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />JULY 10, 1989 <br />Chairman Black called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. <br />Barry, Black, Boche, Carroll, Daykin, Duncan and Grittner. Also <br />present were Planners Susan Hoyt Taff and Tim Malloy, and Administrator <br />Wiessner. <br />Nestingen and Finegan. <br />Duncan moved, seconded by Daykin, to approve the June 5, 1989 Minutes <br />as presented. Motion carried unanimously. <br />H. Leonard Boche, 1776 Fry Street, requested a Permitted Accessory <br />Use for a Utility Shed to be located in the southeast corner of his <br />lot five feet from his property line. Construction will be as indicated <br />in the diagram he attached to his application and indicated the structure <br />will be painted green to blend with its surroundings. <br />Carroll moved, seconded by Daykin, to approve the Permitted Accessory <br />• Use as requested. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Barry arrived at 7:44 P.M. <br />Chairman Black opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 P.M. on the Request <br />for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a parking lot in R-1 Single <br />Family District as requested by Dennnis Hunt on a lot owned by George <br />Peck, 1546 Crawford Avenue. Such Public Hearing Notice was published <br />in the Focus Newspapers at June 28, 1989. <br />Barry questioned whether the conditional use request should be considered <br />based upon the fact that Mr. Hunt does owe back property taxes. <br />Also, the future use of the shopping center should be considered <br />before acting on the request. <br />After further discussion, Carroll moved, seconded by Barry, to continue <br />the Public Hearing to August 7, 1989 if, and only if, Mr. Hunt has <br />provided the necessary requested information. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Dave Black and Planner Malloy reviewed the background of the Code <br />Amendments as chronologically listed in the agenda attachments. <br />Planner Malloy stated that the Planning Commission may want to reconsider <br />its action taken at its June 5th meeting in its motion for a code <br />amendment change on page two, paragraph three, to use the conditional <br />use permit process. The use of the conditional use permit in this <br />instance may be awkward because it requires every accessory structure <br />•on a corner lot to be put through the conditional use process which <br />means requiring a public hearing and fees associated with the request. <br />At the last meeting some Commission members had also expressed concern <br />about the criteria and felt there was a better way to handle such <br />situations. <br />PRESENT <br />ABSENT <br />6/5/89 <br />MINUTES <br />APPROVED <br />LEONARD <br />BOCHE <br />PERMITTED <br />ACCESSORY <br />USE <br />APPROVED <br />PUBLIC <br />HEARING <br />REQUESTED <br />BY DENNIS <br />HUNT <br />CONTINUED <br />CODE <br />AMENDMENTS <br />