My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013.08.05 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2013 CC Minutes
>
2013.08.05 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 1:46:19 PM
Creation date
9/30/2014 9:04:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
8/5/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for August 5, 2013 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Approve revised Assessment, Escrow Disbursement Agreement, and Letter of Credit for <br />Rosemary Way <br />Staff removed this from the Consent Agenda to provide the Council information on recent details <br />of the agreements. At its June 3, 2013 meeting, the City Council approved a revision to the <br />City's assessment policy as well as an assessment agreement and feasibility study for the <br />construction of Rosemary Way west of Everton Avenue. The staff received a draft of a letter of <br />credit along with revisions to the assessment agreement for consideration by the City. In order to <br />off -set the amount of the letter of credit, a significant amount of cash was proposed to be <br />provided up front for construction, and therefore an escrow disbursement agreement had been <br />provided. The proposal differed from the recently adopted city policy, which requires 60% of <br />the total assessment amount be provided to the City to secure the payment of the special <br />assessment, including interest. The developer, Len Pratt, was proposing to provide $450,000 <br />cash and $145,000 in a Letter of Credit. The church to be constructed on the northwest corner of <br />Rosemary Way and Everton Avenue has agreed to cover the additional $125,000 necessary to <br />meet the 60% as required by the Assessment Policy. Council discussed this offer and found it to <br />be acceptable. <br />Haas made motion, Petryk seconded to approve the Assessment Agreement, Escrow <br />Disbursement Agreement, and Letter of Credit subject to further revisions as requested by the <br />City Attorney. <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br />Update on the Bald Eagle Lake Outlet <br />At its July 1, 2013 meeting, the Council discussed the Bald Eagle Lake outlet. Since the <br />meeting, staff has met with officials from the DNR and St. Paul Water Utility to discuss <br />ownership of the outlet as well as the need to reconstruct it. City Engineer Jay Kennedy <br />informed Council that, though definite ownership of the structure has not been determined, there <br />has been cooperation from the DNR, St. Paul Water Utility, and the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District in discussing the matter. Staff hopes to put a funding package together, involving all <br />agencies, to reconstruct the structure. No formal action was taken. <br />Update on DNR Groundwater Management Area and Metropolitan Council Feasibility <br />Studv <br />During the 2013 legislative session, the legislature approved funding related to groundwater <br />management and drinking water supply. The primary purpose is to study and evaluate the use of <br />groundwater within the northeast metropolitan area including the City of Hugo. City <br />Administrator Bryan Bear talked about the U.S. Geological Survey Study done on White Bear <br />Lake; money has been approved for phase two of the study. Also, authority has been given to <br />the DNR to create a groundwater management area to appropriate groundwater, including <br />regulating private wells, which will likely result in conservation regulations and the use of other <br />water sources that could impact growth. The Met Council will also be doing a feasibility study, <br />which will include pumping water from the Mississippi River to the northeast metro area. It was <br />noted by the Council that, though the Met Council does not regulate groundwater, it does have <br />implications on land use planning. No formal action was taken. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.