Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION 2002-18 <br />APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR CENTEX HOMES FOR <br />"CLEARWATER CROSSING" ON PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF FENWAY <br />BOULEVARD AND NORTH OF 132ND STREET NORTH <br />WHEREAS, Centex Homes has requested approval of a site plan and variance to allow <br />construction of 122 townhome units on property legally described as follows: <br />Outlot B, Woods of Bald Eagle Lake, according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington <br />County, Minnesota, except that part platted as Townhomes of Bald Eagle Lake, <br />according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan and variance at a duly <br />called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the site <br />plan and variance for Centex homes for "Clearwater Crossing" development, subject to <br />the following conditions: <br />1. A site plan is approved to allow 122 townhomes and three outlots, in accordance with <br />the plans and application received by the City on March 18, 2002, except as amended <br />by this resolution. <br />2. A variance is granted to allow five, 10 -unit townhome buildings where 8 -unit <br />buildings are permitted. The variance is granted based on the following findings: <br />a. Townhomes and apartments are a permitted use in the R-5 zoning district. The <br />variance is simply required to allow five, 10 -unit townhome condominium <br />buildings where the ordinance limits townhome buildings to a maximum of 8 <br />units per building. The variance is from the townhome performance standards, <br />and not the R-5 district standards. The size and massing of the 10 -unit townhome <br />buildings would be smaller than the permitted apartment building. <br />b. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship because it would <br />limit the applicant's ability to provide a reasonable transition between potentially <br />incompatible land uses and still provide environmental protection. The variance <br />would allow the developer to provide a transition in building mass and scale from <br />the industrial property on the east to the single family zoning on the west. The <br />variance would also allow the developer to preserve trees and wetlands on the <br />west side of the property where smaller buildings are currently proposed. <br />c. Granting the variance would be consistent with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance and the R-5 district standards, which allow both townhomes and <br />apartments. The 10 -unit buildings would be consistent with other uses that are <br />allowed in the R-5 district. The variance would allow a mixture of 4-, 8- and 10 - <br />unit buildings within this development. <br />