My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1996.08.05 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1996 CC Minutes
>
1996.08.05 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 1:45:34 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 10:35:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
8/5/1996
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Citi Council meeting of August 5. 1996 <br />Page _ _ <br />DRAINAGE ISSUES <br />The City is currently working on drainage programs for the Clearwater <br />Creek. Hardwood Creek. and School Section/Goggins Lake subwatersheds. In <br />order to give these issues detailed considerationstaff recommended that <br />the City Council establish a special meeting in August to review storm <br />water issues in the City of Hugo. <br />Miron made motion, Barnes seconded, <br />Monday. August 26. 1996, at 7:.30 PM, <br />programs for Clearwater and Hardwood <br />lake subwatersheds. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />LMC FINANCIAL REQUEST <br />to schedule a Council workshop for <br />Hugo City Hall, to discuss drainage <br />Creeks. and School Section/Goggins <br />On July 15, 1996, the City Council considered a request from the League of <br />Minnesota Cities for a financial contribution of $42.3.00 toward the <br />League's efforts to fund a legal challenge made by U.S. West, which <br />attempts to limit cities' control over public rights-of-way. Action was <br />tabled on this request until this evening's meetina. At issue is the fact <br />that communication companies are facing rapid changes in technology, both <br />in the use of fiber optic cable and wireless telephone services. These <br />services lead to both a substantial investment by the communication <br />companies in infrastructure (largely located in public rights-of-way) and <br />substantial revenues. Communication companies have determined that it is <br />in their best interest to attempt to limit the authority cities have in <br />controlling their use of the public right-of-ways. This is a major issue <br />to cities in Minnesota and across the country. It is the City <br />Administrator's opinion that any loss of local control over public road <br />right-of-ways will be costly to the City, and cause additional time to be <br />spent coordinating City projects. Public right-of-ways are generally <br />obtained by the City as part of the subdivision process, and utilities are <br />allowed to use them as a matter of convenience and cost effectiveness. In <br />doing so, the utilities have a responsibility to meet standards set by the <br />City in the construction of the utilities and to worts; with the City in a <br />fair and equitable manner in the installation, relocation, maintenance, <br />and repair of these public and semipublic facilities. The X423 proposed <br />by the League is a minor amount when compared to thousands of dollars it <br />could cost the City in the future to relocate or repair utility lines. <br />Staff recommended the City contribute $423 to the League's efforts to <br />protect local management of public rights- of -way. <br />Barnes made motion, Goiffon seconded, approving the $423 expenditure to <br />the League of Minnesota Cities in their efforts to protect local <br />management on public rights-of-way. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.