My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010.10.14 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2010 PC Minutes
>
2010.10.14 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 2:33:54 PM
Creation date
2/20/2015 10:51:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
10/14/2010
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes — October 14, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br />Len Pratt, the Developer, addressed the Planning Commission. He apologized for the sign being <br />in the wrong location and to the Heritage Ponds Association for that. He stated that he told Mink <br />Homes to put up the sign but wasn't clear where to put it and about the process for the IUP. <br />Rosenquist asked about the sign maintenance. <br />Len Pratt assured the Planning Commission that they would fix the sign, and added that the sign <br />must be working because they were able to build two homes already and have sold two other lots <br />in the development. <br />Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />McRoberts stated that he would like to see a set termination date or event because the 90% could <br />take a long time to complete. <br />Rachel answered that the Planning Commission Could add a date to the motion. <br />McRoberts Motioned, Moore seconded, to approve the IUP request with additional language that <br />the permit would have a 3 year termination date, and could be reapplied for after such time. <br />All Aye, motion carried. <br />Variances <br />Community Development Director, Bryan Bear, gave an update to the planning commission on <br />the recent supreme court ruling regarding variances. He explained that a majority of the <br />variances are seen at the Board of Zoning, however the Planning Commission should be familiar <br />with the ruling because they would see variance requests when they are along with site plans and <br />subdivisions. <br />Adjournment <br />McRoberts motioned, Moore seconded, to adjourn. <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br />Meeting adjourned. <br />Dennis Fields <br />Planning Commission Secretary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.