My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006.03.23 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2006 PC Minutes
>
2006.03.23 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 2:25:07 PM
Creation date
2/20/2015 11:40:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
3/23/2006
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes — March 23, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br />FEMA program. Minimization of impacts to wetlands was reviewed by Federal Army Corp of <br />Engineers, State Board of Soil and Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources, Rice Creek <br />Watershed District, and the City of Hugo. The City would require four feet of separation between <br />highest observed ground water level and the lowest floor elevation of structures. There would be one <br />foot of separation of low floor to the high water level of the spill-over point at the crossing of highway <br />61. Ponds would have regulation of three feet separation from high water level of homes on site. <br />Significant analysis would be done on all ponds and wetland on the site. <br />Bill Slowkowski, 15470 Goodview Avenue North, was concerned about preserving the tress along the <br />south of the site. <br />Bruce Discher, 6302 165th Street North, said there are approximately 45 turkeys living and breeding on <br />the property as well as deer and pheasants, and he did not want to see their habitat and the trees wiped <br />out. He said he had seen the 500 year flood plain flooded within the last five years. He questioned the <br />traffic on 165th and wondered how tractors and hay wagons would maneuver around on a round -about. <br />He wondered why they were finally getting notice since the project had been around since November. <br />Paul Courneya, 6122 Goodview Trail Circle North, said he did not want to see the trees removed; they <br />would create a natural sound barrier and it would be a loss of habitat. He wanted to see the plan be <br />restructured to accommodate pathways through there, and felt removal of the trees would reduce his <br />property value. He showed the Commission pictures of the large pines on the site. <br />Nina Huffman, 6136 Goodview Trail Circle, reiterated the others' comments on water and wildlife. <br />She did not want to see the trees lost. <br />Brian Ludvick, 6361 165th Street North, said there were beautiful oak woods to the south of his <br />property and development brings oak wilt, though he did not know why. <br />Andi Moffatt, WSB Consultant, said there was evidence that disturbance and damage to trees or their <br />root system does increase the chance of oak wilt. <br />Berry Larson, 15450 Goodview Avenue North, said the floodplain issue and water should not be <br />underestimated. He had seen it backed up from holding ponds into their back yards. He said if the <br />same criteria were used for ponds and wetlands, it would be insufficient. <br />Gary Williams, owner of industrial property south of the project, asked why the south portion could <br />not be preserved as a City park for a buffer, and why the project needed to be so large. <br />Sharon Dierkhising, 6515 170th Street North, said she had lived on their five acre parcel for about 25 <br />years and has experienced flooding on their property and was concerned about more water flowing on <br />their property. She said there are deer, fox, and wolves on the site and geese land on the field and pond <br />while migrating. She was concerned about the possibility of the road being reconstructed in front of <br />her house and said plans for sewer and water in the area should be shared with those along their road. <br />There were no other comments and Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />Phil Belfiori said the wetland habitat would be protected to the highest extent possible. The wetland <br />and surrounding area have been classified according to habitat and all agencies would be reviewing it <br />and working to avoid any impacts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.