My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005.05.12 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2005 PC Minutes
>
2005.05.12 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 2:22:15 PM
Creation date
2/20/2015 11:48:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
5/12/2005
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes — May 12, 2005 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Gerry Phillips, 6050 148th Street North, explained that he owned adjacent property to the west <br />and asked if there were any plans to extend 150th Street and if there were plans for another <br />east/west street connecting to Highway 61. <br />Schumann informed him that there were no plans at this time but a connecting street to the north <br />was likely when the properties in that area develop. <br />The Planner explained that there had been conversations in the past about extending 150th south <br />to 148th street and possibly eliminating Geneva Avenue. <br />There were no other comments and Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />The Commission discussed the sidewalk along 150' street. Since there are no sidewalks in the <br />development to the east, and nothing to the west, a sidewalk would not connect to anything. It <br />was unknown how the property to the north would develop. The Commission also discussed the <br />exteriors of the buildings that would be facing Oneka Lake Boulevard and the possibility of <br />finishing a portion of them with brick. <br />Rosenquist said he felt it would be wasteful to put in a sidewalk that did not connect anywhere. <br />Hoffbeck said she felt the architecture looked reasonable and nice and wouldn't suggest putting <br />in sidewalks that had no future and to put brick on the ends of the building was not necessary. <br />Rosenquist asked the applicant if he was willing to put a facade on the bottom sides of the <br />building facing the streets. <br />The applicant Seth Marshall, 9011 Highway 10, said they had planned on putting an extensive <br />amount of brick on the fronts of the building and would be okay with reducing that and putting <br />some brick on the sides. <br />Weidt said he would like to see brick on the street side also. <br />Bailly said she did not see the sidewalk as being necessary and there should be brick wrapped <br />around on the ends of the buildings. <br />McRoberts said he was okay with taking the brick from the gables and putting it on the ends of <br />the building, and he was okay with no sidewalk. <br />Kleissler was okay with brick on the ends to make it attractive from the street and also had <br />questions on snow clearing and on the safety of the shared driveways. <br />The Planner explained the street was reasonably short so emergency vehicles could back out and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.