My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014.02.13 PC Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Agendas/Packets
>
2014 PC Packets
>
2014.02.13 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2015 11:05:04 AM
Creation date
2/20/2015 12:25:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
2/13/2014
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes — January 9, 2014 <br />Page 2 <br />Mark Wold, the applicant, explained to the Planning Commission that they realize the site is <br />tight, but they like the location. He stated that they have not been able to meet the guidelines in <br />regards to building orientation or placement. He stated that he has presented other building <br />orientations and placements to O'Reilly's Real Estate Committee, as staff has suggested, and <br />they have stated that will not work. <br />The Planning Commission generally agreed that the building was too large for the site and they <br />were uncomfortable with all the proposed variance requests. They encouraged the applicant to <br />reduce the building size to eliminate the yard setback variances and to provide an adequate <br />amount of parking for a typical retail user. <br />The Planning Commission discussed the building placement and stated that they understand the <br />desire for a retail user to place the building in that location, but questioned whether it met the <br />downtown design guidelines. Commissioner Knauss questioned whether having buildings placed <br />at the street is a good idea in downtown because most of the users will have the back side of the <br />building towards the street. There was also discussion on reviewing the downtown plan and <br />design guidelines in regards to building placement and how it will affect site plans on other <br />properties in downtown. The Planning Commission recognized that this project and site is <br />important on what will be expected in the rest of downtown. They wanted to make sure it meets <br />the downtown design guidelines. <br />There were also concerns about the buffering from the adjacent residential uses, snow removal, <br />and landscaping. <br />Adjournment <br />Bronwen motioned, Rosenquist seconded, to adjourn at 8:36 pm. <br />All Ayes, motion carried. <br />Meeting adjourned. <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br />Rachel Juba <br />Planner <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.