2001.03.28 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting March 28, 2000- page 2 approval of the Conditional Use Permit. He also stated in his staff report that Chapter 40-12 of the City Code allows mobile homes or modular homes as a temporary residence in hardship situations, provide approval is granted by the City Council and the permit is renewed every 90 days. Because the family member intended to occupy the home for an extended period of time, the applicant requested a conditional use permit so the home could remain on the property without having to renew the permit every 90 days, as well as pay $25.00. Schumann opened the public hearing. Colonna explained his daughter had kidney disease and they were uncertain at this time what the outcome would be. He said he considered subdividing the property to allow a principle dwelling on each parcel but it would be tough to do so because the wetlands would cause the property behind the home to become landlocked. There were no other comments. Schumann closed the public hearing. The Planning Commission discussed whether is should be handled as a hardship under City Code 40-12 and issued a temporary mobile home permit, or if a conditional use permit should be issued under Section 6.2 of the City Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. Schumann made motion, Peltier seconded, to recommend a temporary mobile home permit be issued per City Code Chapter 40-12, modifying the renewal requirement to have the permit renewed every year instead of every 90 days, and waving the $25.00 renewal fee. Ayes: Kleissler, Peltier, Rooney, Rosenquist, Schumann Nay: McRoberts Motion carried. THIS APPLICATION WAS DISSCUSSED AGAIN LATER THIS EVENING. Site Plan (Sixty-one Stop) The Planning Commission considered the application of Mark Granger for site plan approval for Sixty -One Stop Inc. for a 1, 120 square foot bank building and a 600 square foot addition to the convenience store building on the property located at 14815 Forest Boulevard North. Lake Area Bank would operate a branch office on the site consisting of several tellers and a drive up window. The Community Development Director reviewed his staff report with the Planning Commission, recommending denial of the site plan because the proposed site plan fails to comply with ordinance standards. The Planning Commission was in agreement that the site does not contain adequate parking, circulation, or stacking area for the proposed uses. Rosenquist made motion to table the request to allow them time to create another site plan. Other members of the Planning Commission said they wanted to hear from the applicant so they could give him feedback on the request. Rosenquist withdrew his motion.