My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001.04.25 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2001 PC Minutes
>
2001.04.25 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2015 3:54:51 PM
Creation date
2/23/2015 9:37:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
4/25/2001
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Call to Order <br />Chairperson Schumann called the meeting of the Hugo Planning Commission of April 25, to order at 7:05 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Kleissler, Malaski, McRoberts, Peltier, Rooney, Rosenquist, Schumann <br />ALSO PRESENT: Community Development Director, John Rask <br />Community Development Assistant, Michele Lindau <br />Minutes for March 28, 2001 <br />Peltier made motion, Kleissler seconded, to approve the minutes for March 28, 2001 as submitted. <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br />Site Plan (Woody's Bar) <br />The Planning Commission continued discussion on the request of Brad Smith, Owner of Woody's Bar, 1201.0 <br />Keystone Avenue North, for site plan approval for a 1,920 square foot building addition to west side of the <br />existing Woody's Bar. At the Planning Commission meeting on February 28, 2001 the Planning Commission <br />considered the site plan application and tabled action to provide the applicant with an opportunity to revise the <br />plan to eliminate the requested variances, which included a setback variance and a variance to reduce the <br />number of required parking stalls. <br />Smith revised the site plan to show a reduction in the building size and an increase in parking stalls, which he <br />was able to obtain by relocating the septic system. Staff had noted the revised parking plan still did not conform <br />to the City's parking standards because the west side did not have the required five-foot setback. The plan also <br />did not show details on parking lot construction, drainage improvements, or landscaping plans. <br />Members of the commission were concerned about the removal of mature trees and the parking of bikes, <br />snowmobiles, and horses. They also said they did not want to approve a parking plan that was partially located <br />in the City of Grant. Also of concern was the creation of landlocked parcels. <br />Malaski said she was uncomfortable with approving the site plan when revisions needed to be made to it. She <br />also wanted to see the landscaping plan and a more defined parking plan. <br />Rosenquist said he wanted to see a revised site plan and approval of the City of Grant. <br />Peltier said she was O.K. with the site plan with the conditions stated in the draft resolutions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.