Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting July 25, 2001- page 2 <br />flat parcels were more desirous. Peterson felt the City would approve in the reduction in the density from 10 to <br />i units. <br />There were no other comments and Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />The Commission agreed it was consistent with the land use plan for the area and approved of the decrease in <br />density. <br />Schumann made motion, Rosenquist seconded, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat to be known as <br />Beaver Ponds 6`h Addition for 6 single-family units with the two conditions as stated in the draft resolution. <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br />Amendment to MUSA — Leroux Property <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the request of Pratt -Oakwood, LLC and Contractor <br />Property Developers for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to include approximately 120 acres within the <br />Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The property is located south of 165`h Street and west of Highway <br />61, and is approximately 120 acres. <br />John Peterson and Len Pratt, members of the development team, were present to answer questions. <br />The applicant had submitted a sketch plan with the application, which provided a development concept for the <br />120 -acre parcel as well as a concept for 268 additional acres that adjoin the subject property. Of the additional <br />268 acres included in the sketch plan, the applicant controls/owns approximately 80 acres and the remaining <br />property (188 acres) is owned by Trail Head Development. The applicant and Trail Head Development are <br />working together to master plan the total 388 acres. <br />The sketch plan submitted by the applicant also proposed to establish an area for a future school and community <br />park to meet the needs of both the City and the White Bear Lake School District. While the sketch plan showed <br />the proposed school and park sites within the current MUSA, the applicant would like the opportunity to master <br />plan a much larger area in order to make it financially feasible to incorporate the school and park/playfields in <br />the development concept. <br />The subject property is also located within the Everton Avenue Land Use Study Area, which provided new <br />information regarding future development in this area of the City. The City's 1996 Comprehensive Plan did not <br />include a detailed land use plan for this area, nor did the sewer, water, parks, storm water or transportation <br />elements of the plan adequately address future needs for this area of the City. The Everton Avenue Plan, which <br />was developed with a considerable amount of public input, provided a much greater level of detail with regard <br />to future development in this area of the City. <br />The Everton Avenue plan also eliminated the future extension of municipal services to 178 acres, of which <br />approximately 100 acres are located in the current 2020 MUSA. As such, there is less land in the 2020 MUSA <br />than what was initially proposed in the 1996 Comprehensive Plan. <br />Because the request was for a MUSA expansion and not a plat review, the Community Development Director asked <br />the Commission to focus its comments on the appropriateness of adding the subject property to the MUSA, and not <br />