My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001.07.25 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2001 PC Minutes
>
2001.07.25 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2015 3:55:04 PM
Creation date
2/23/2015 9:51:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
7/25/2001
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting July 25, 2001- page 3 <br />etailed aspects of the sketch plan, which was only provided as a tool to present a comprehensive look at the entire <br />rea. <br />Schumann opened the public hearing. <br />Jim Peterson, Trailhead Development, said he had been involved in the Everton Avenue planning process and <br />was aware of what the residents felt was important. Peterson said that to extend the MUSA would allow them <br />to work with other developers to address what the Everton Avenue neighborhood group felt was important, and <br />it would give them the ability to make the needed investment to proceed with the plan. <br />There were no other comments and Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />Malaski had concerns about the increased transportation in the area and acknowledged she would have an <br />opportunity to review and comment on the preliminary plat. Malaski also approved of the school concept. <br />Rosenquist was in favor of the MUSA adjustment saying he felt it fit into the Everton Avenue plan and a larger <br />project area would be better to work with to prevent piece meal development in the area. <br />Peltier stated that the property would be subject to the current moratorium. <br />Kleissler commended the developers for actively participating in the Everton Avenue study, and felt the <br />development in the area would have a lot of visual impact. Kleissler noted that the transportation and park plan <br />would need to be tied together. <br />McRoberts discussed the need for green areas and corridors in the developments and looked forward to <br />reviewing the preliminary plat and discussing it at that time. <br />Rooney said he viewed the present MUSA as a reasonable line in the sand where the sewer should stop, and that <br />he felt the residents on 165th Street liked their current lifestyle; expanding the MUSA would interfere with that. <br />He also stated he had limited confidence in the development ordinances of the City and he had heard nothing <br />that makes it in the City's best interest to expand the MUSA. <br />Schumann said he felt the City had gone through the process and identified these areas as needing services and <br />that having a larger area to work with would make it easier to deal with traffic and infrastructure issues. <br />Malaski made motion, Schumann seconded, to recommend a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to include the <br />approximately 120 acres located south of 165th Street and west of Highway 61, within the Metropolitan Urban <br />Service Area (MUSA). <br />Ayes: Malaski, McRoberts, Peltier, Rosenquist, Schumann <br />Nay: Kleissler, Rooney <br />Motion carried. <br />Rooney said he felt the actions of the City are showing greater sensitivity to the needs of the developers as <br />)pposed to the residents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.