Laserfiche WebLink
/ <br />HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 26, 1988 <br />The regular meeting of the Hugo Planning Commission was called to order by <br />Chairman Senkler at 7:00PM. <br />Gail Thoreson was sworn in as planning commissioner. <br />PRESENT: Sullivan, Henry, Thoreson, Jesinski, Barnes, Senkler, Carole <br />LaBelle, Administrator Huber <br />Motion made by Henry, seconded by Sullivan to approve the minutes of <br />September 28, 1988 as amended. <br />All aye, motion passed. <br />Chairman Senkler requested Administrator Huber review this request with <br />the planning commission. Mr. Huber stated that Mr. Mike Lengyel and Mrs. <br />Jeanette Pfurtscheller have made application to the City of Hugo for the <br />subdivision of a 36 acre parcel of land plus an additional 10 acre <br />outlot. This request has been reviewed by the planning commission on two <br />previous occasions and has been tabled to October 26th. In reviewing the <br />plat of Round Lake Addition there has been a number of major revisions <br />since last reviewed by the planning commission. The primary roadway <br />serving this development from Janero Ave. has been moved from the south <br />border of the site to a location serving both outlot A and the balance of <br />the subdivision. Although we have received a revised preliminary plat <br />there was no explanation as to why the roadway was relocated. We can <br />assume however, that it has something to do with the wetland areas and <br />requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. The revised roadway <br />location should eliminate some of the concerns noted by adjacent property <br />owners at the previous continued public hearing. In reviewing the plat it <br />appears that the lots meet minimum size and frontage on a public roadway. <br />It should be noted, however, that the revised roadway will eliminate any <br />possibility of connecting this subdivision development to County Rd. 10 in <br />the future. If the planning commission recommends approval of this <br />subdivision we would suggest said recommendation be subject to special <br />conditions. <br />Mr. Bill Simonet informed the audience that Steve Woods of the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District required the change in the road location. Mr. Simonet <br />stated that he has hired an engineer to address the roadway issue and they <br />will remove the first roadway and return that area to its original <br />condition. <br />Mr. Mike Ball, Craig Breeder, and Ray Gatzow were concerned with the <br />location of the proposed roadway. Mr. Ball indicated that the easement to <br />the north is private and would like to see this easement closed when the <br />roadway is installed. Mr. Huber informed Mr. Ball that this was a private <br />issue and the city cannot dictate whether the easement continues to be <br />used as access to County 10. Mr. Simonet agreed that the easement <br />crossing Mr. Ball's property would be vacated when the roadway was <br />installed. Mr. Ball questioned whether the lots could meet the 300' <br />setback requirement and if Washington County reviewed the perc tests. <br />