Laserfiche WebLink
HINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS <br />OF THE <br />HUGO PLANNING COtOUSSION <br />February 13, 1980 <br />The public hearing to consider the rezoning request of James Brevig* was called <br />to order by Chairwoman Theodora Peltier at 7:31 PM. <br />PRESENT: Peloquin, Hanson, Greger, Lorch, McAllister, Peltier <br />Tom Crever was also present. <br />ABSENT: Houle <br />Mr. Brevig is requesting to rezone his property from the RRII district to the <br />SFE district. If approved, the property would be divided into one 3 acre parcel <br />and one 2 acre parcel. A restrictive covenant would be drawn up to limit the <br />propertytD only two lots. (HOULE ARRIVED AT 7:36 PM) The pert test provided <br />had been reviewed by Howard Kuusisto and Tom Crever and met with their approval. <br />Mr. Robert Waller, 14310 Homestead Avenue, stated that he objected to the public <br />hearing notice not stating what the property was to be rezoned to. Mr. Waller <br />wanted to have the dike resolved before any consideration was given to the rezoning. <br />He also stated that a Mr. Bernard Hanson was not notified of the public hearing. <br />Mr. Waller had no problem with the two building sites, but stated that the problem <br />would be passed onto a new property owner. <br />Mr. Jerome Hintz, 14077 Homestead Avenue, lives south of the Brevig property. <br />He also felt that the water should be resolved before the land is divided into <br />any new lots. <br />Mr. Timothy Geck, attorney for Brevig, stated that Mr. Brevig wanted the dike <br />removed from his property. He understood that the city would ultimately maintain <br />the pond at a certain water level. <br />Vern Peloquin wanted to know if Mr. et ig was using the dike problem as a lever <br />to get a rezoning. Geck stated thatw fiey were looking for was a fair resolution <br />of the problem for Brevig, the city, and adjoining property owners. <br />Peloquin felt that another house would only intensify the problem. He stated <br />that SCS in Stillwater has monies available to municipalities to help alleviate <br />the costs to correct water problems. If they qualify, they would pay 75% of the <br />project cost. <br />McAllister asked Geck if his client would be willing to sell the easement to the <br />city and leave the land in one parcel. Geck stated that they had not considered <br />that alternative. They had felt that the rezoning was the best solution. <br />Hintz felt that a rezoning would not take care of any problem. The new land owner <br />would take over the problem. He said that he had fought to get the dike in to keep <br />the water off his property. He contended that the dike was on the original plan. <br />George Atkinson, 14214 Homestead Avenue, lives north of the Brevig property. He <br />agreed that the dike matter should be resolved before any rezoning is approved. <br />