1981.04.08 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION April 8, 1981 The meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Theodora Peltier at 8:06 PM. PRESENT: Peloquin,Hanson, Greger, Fashingbauer, Lorch,Knuteson, Peltier Motion made by Hanson, seconded by Greger, to approve the minutes of March 25, 1981, after the following corrections have been made: Page 2 (Zimmco Wood) - insert - Mrs. Peltier would like to make an on-site in- spection of the Zimmco property. Page 3 (Richard Vail) - 3rd paragraph (Greger stated that motion for denial was made because corner lot should be wider than interior lot.) All aye. Motion Carried. RONALD REICHSTADT - SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE Mr. Reichstadt, 12768 Irish Avenue North, has made application to construct a 30 x 60 pole barn ahead of the principal building. He owns 5 acres in the RRII district. This matter was tabledfrom the last meeting so that the Planning members could make an inspection of the property. Hanson commented that he had a problem with the location of the proposed building, with respect to the adjoining property owner. The only place where a house could be constructed would result in that person facing the pole barn. Mr. Reichstadt stated that he located the building where he did because of slope from his existing driveway, and because of his drain field being located behind his house. Greger also expressed his concern for the adjoining property owner, who is affected by the variance. He stated that if the adjoining property owner had no problem with the location of ts�oylding he could recommend approval of the request. Peloquin did not feel the city create a hardship on property owners in order to satisfy their neighbor. Motion made by Hanson, seconded by Greger, to recommend denial of the request of Ronald Reichstadt for a variance to construct a 30 x 60 pole barn ahead of the principal building, on the basis that it will adversely effect the property to the south. VOTING FOR: Greger, Hanson, Lorch VOTING AGAINST: Fashingbauer, Peltier ABSTAINED; Peloquin, Knuteson MOTION CARRIED SPECIAL USE PERMIT Peloquin did not feel that the loafing shed (13 x 36) should be considered as part of accessory acreage because it was just a shelter and had no flooring. Greger suggested that Mr.Reichstadt appear before the City Council to see what action they migr, take on the variance request. If they deny also, Mr. Reichstadt will have to relocate his proposed building. If they approve, Mr. Reichstadt will have to go back to the Planning Commission so that they can make a recommendation on the request for SUP. The Planning Commission felt they could not make a recommendation on the SUP because of the denial for the variance request. Mr. Reichstadt was also advised to provide