Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS <br />OF THE <br />HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />July 8, 1981 <br />The public hearing to consider the request of Dean Nelson to rezone approximately <br />20 acres from CONS to AG was called to order by Theodora Peltier at 7:35 PM. <br />PRESENT: Peloquin, Hanson, Greger, Lorch, Peltier <br />ABSENT: Fashingbauer, Knuteson <br />Mrs. Peltier read the public hearing notice as published in the Forest Lake Times. <br />Mr. Nelson owns 80 acres and is proposing the rezoning of 20 acres from CONS to <br />AG and the division of the 80 acres into a 60 acre parcel and two 10 acre parcels, <br />if rezoned. The present house will be located on the 60 acre parcel. Mr. Nelson <br />has relocated to Colorado, and would like to retain the two 10 acre parcels in <br />case he moves back to Minnesota. Mr. Flannery, attorney for Mr. Nelson, wQs <br />present, and stated that he felt the rezoning would conform with the balance of <br />the property in the area. Some of the other parcels are much smaller. Hardwood <br />Creek runs to the east of the property. <br />Francis Lutz, 8112 157th Street, and Sandy Borndole, 16237 Harrow Avenue, were <br />present, and stated that they had no objection to the rezoning request. <br />Perc tests were provided for the lots to be rezoned. After review of the survey <br />by Bill Greger, he did not feel that the lots constituted 10 acres. The lines <br />on the survey were staggered because of the trees located on the land. Mr. <br />Flannery stated that he was informed by Mr. Hult that Parcel A was 9.998 acres and <br />Parcel B, 10.006 acres. (FASHINGBAUER ARRIVED AT 7:51 PM). <br />Motion made by Peloquin, seconded by Peltier, to close the public hearing at <br />7:52 PM. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />(KNUTESON ARRIVED AT 7:55 PM). <br />The regular meeting was called to order at 8:02 PM. <br />PRESENT: Peloquin, Hanson, Greger, Lorch, Fashingbauer, Knuteson, Peltier <br />Motion made by Lorch, seconded by Peloquin, to approve the minutes of June 24, <br />1981, after the following corrections have been made: <br />Minutes of June 10th meeting should have �eoeprected as follows (page 1): The <br />Planning Commission felt that a proper application, by the fee owners of the <br />property, would be considered under the subdivision ordinance as such division <br />is consistent with that ordinance." <br />Page 3 (Tom Mulner) - Mr. Mulner wanted to know the feelings of the Planning Commission <br />about rezoning.the old Delmar Strandberg property <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />