Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA <br />HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />August 24, 1977 <br />The meeting was called to order by Chairman Ehret at 8:10 PM. <br />PRESENT: Ehret, Peloquin, Peltier, Rosenquist, and McAllister. Greger <br />arrived at 8:22 PM. <br />ABSENT: Gillen <br />James Br6vig - Rezoning <br />McAllister stated that he has been discussing the matter with Brevig <br />and there is still some litigation regarding the dike problem. Mr. <br />Brevig would like the rezoning tabled until the legal problems are re- <br />solved, because he had been advised that the property would not be <br />sellable until then. Ehret stated that the Commission would have to <br />take some action or Brevig would have to withdraw his application for <br />action at some later date. He was not sure if legal litigation would <br />take precedence over the 60 day time limit. Brevig stated that after <br />a ruling was made, he would be in a better position to have a professional <br />soil test taken, if required. <br />Motion made by McAllister, seconded by Peltier, to table the Brevig <br />rezoning application until January, 1978, at his request, pending out- <br />come of litigation on said property, and that City Attorney give his <br />opinion to the Planning Commission as to whether this tabling is <br />acceptable. <br />VOTING FOR: Ehret, Peloquin, Peliter, Rosenquist, and McAllister <br />ABSTAINED: Greger <br />Motion Carried. <br />White Bear Rod and Gun Club - Temporary amended Special Use Permit <br />The gun club, represented by Jerry Perron, is requesting to use.the <br />clubhouse for rental, such as weddings, p ties, etc. Peltier stated <br />that if the Special Use Permit granted to the gun club is still active, <br />Item 5 would not include group gatherings Perron stated that the <br />building is just molding away, and is asking to consider using just as <br />a temporary thing. Ehret asked Perron what he considered temporary, and <br />Perron stated that that in one year the club would know one way or <br />another where they stand as far as the gun club is concerned. Perron <br />considered the Supreme Court ruling as opened ended. Peltier stated <br />that the definition of a lodgeAincluded members and guests, and did not <br />i nclude commercial/recreation. osenquist stated that at this point <br />we are not sure if it is a gun club or not, and do not know what ground <br />we are on. Ehret suggested that a letter be sent to the City Attorney <br />and the County Planner, asking them for their written opinion as to: <br />1. Can we consider a temporary amended Special Use Permit? <br />2. Can we consider it for the use in question? <br />3. Point out that what the club is seeking is a temporary amend- <br />ment to the Special Use Permit. <br />4. Ask if there is in fact a Special Use Permit in existence. <br />Their responses should be received prior to the meeting of Sept. 14, 1977. <br />